Before the 12th amendment, the presidential candidate who got the second most electoral votes became the vice president. This meant they were usually different parties.

It occurred to me that one thing this achieved was always ensuring that there was someone in the room who would be willing to disagree with the president. He couldn’t surround himself with yes-men.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      they kinda do. they authorize it and decide if a selection is hired for the job. this would just take them into also be part of firing so that they can be more independent in their actions. They actually can be impeached now though. I was thinking more that you reverse the firing so that they don’t have to worry as much. so a president brings up a canidate to congress and they say yeah or nay. I would add he presents the need to remove a canidate and they say nay or yeah.

      • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Good point. I like that. I’d want congress to appoint cabinet members with a veto option from the president with the standard two-thirds vote to override. President can fire pending approval of congress with a simple majority or congress can impeach directly.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          problem with congress appointing is there are so many people that have to be vetted. not impossible but would need to be done by committee. so it makes sense to have the president propose a canidate that then needs to get the congressional votes to ascend. of course trump did a lot with interim people.