• FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    He’s just admitting the usage of LLMs.

    And we’re saying we should ban people like that. And they made the insane claim that it wasn’t possible.

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      It isn’t possible. If you get society at a level of repressiveness that you want to have (you know who else only thinks in black and white terms?) they will simply not disclose it, leaving you with nothing to go on besides witch hunts like in the dark ages.

        • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Reported for the personal insult btw, this is not needed in any way or form.

          Yes, they are disclosing it, and that’s a good thing for you! If you want to avoid products that use LLMs in their code, being informed is key. Increasing pressure on coders who are also under pressure to provide a service - especially if it is fucking unpaid like most FOSS projects - will only mean that they don’t disclose it anymore, because if they can increase their output (for instance by running unit tests or scan for issues) in the limited time they can provide, they will take that edge, people like you be damned. It’s only human.

          Your way will only lead into a future where most coders use LLMs, and you are in the dark about it, leaving you without the option to choose.