“When an individual is no longer in ICE custody then ICE will no longer be responsible for them,” the agency said. “This is common sense.”
Kinda like when they “dropped off” that guy who didn’t speak English and didn’t have a phone or his wallet outside a closed Dunkin Donuts in the middle of a freezing night wearing summer clothes - who could possibly have foreseen that he’d freeze to death?!
“Relatives and the attorney believe that ICE did not grasp the risks Michel faced being released alone on a city street that was probably unfamiliar to her, especially given the state of her health.”
Kinda like when they “dropped off” that guy who didn’t speak English and didn’t have a phone or his wallet outside a closed Dunkin Donuts in the middle of a freezing night wearing summer clothes - who could possibly have foreseen that he’d freeze to death?!
Or the innocent man they were forced to bring back from El Salvador.
Are you talking about this woman or was there another case
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/02/ice-death-pittsburgh-daphy-michel-haiti
“Relatives and the attorney believe that ICE did not grasp the risks Michel faced being released alone on a city street that was probably unfamiliar to her, especially given the state of her health.”
I’d reason they did grasp the risks. Very well.
It looks like they are conflating two incidents. There was another involving a blind man and a closed dunkin donuts.