• [email protected]@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I get what you mean now. You mean adequately and fully solve the issue as opposed to reduce it. I can’t argue with that, but just think that like that saying goes, we shouldn’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

    Also, how do any rechargeable batteries for any device (like mobile phones, for instance) get recycled now, and why can’t these batteries be recycled the same way if the batteries were collected in the same way as those other devices’ batteries?

    • Mobiuthuselah@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Exactly. I do appreciate that this will help reduce some waste, but without addressing the actual problem of recycling those batteries, lessening the impact isn’t getting us very far.

      I agree with you that this is a start, and that’s something, but it’s missing the point. Perhaps ongoing issues with batteries in landfills will indicate that more needs to be done.

      • [email protected]@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Right, this is a step forward. The next step would be to require either a) all devices with batteries have user-replaceable batteries, b) a deposit system similar to aluminum cans but much higher value, to incentivize people to return the devices (or batteries) instead of tossing them in the trash, or, ideally, both a and b.