I guess that makes sense. It still seems like a contrived question that just needed an answer. Any answer that would fit, like a scientist actively looking for results that confirm a theory.
I don’t mean that in a derogatory way, btw, just that it always seemed naive to me.
I know you didn’t. Council of Nicea had an emperor’s whims to justify and imperialism to uphold, so cutting out about half of the debates (because that’s what judeocristian scriptures were, before they were made into the infallible word and will of the Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnibenevolent, One True.
I guess that makes sense. It still seems like a contrived question that just needed an answer. Any answer that would fit, like a scientist actively looking for results that confirm a theory.
I don’t mean that in a derogatory way, btw, just that it always seemed naive to me.
I know you didn’t. Council of Nicea had an emperor’s whims to justify and imperialism to uphold, so cutting out about half of the debates (because that’s what judeocristian scriptures were, before they were made into the infallible word and will of the Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnibenevolent, One True.