• bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Gtfo of here, we should all know trade groups hire agencies to construct studies from it’s cool to reach that conclustion.

    You are either ignorant and given to trolling people you think (often incorrectly,) have made some offense, or a fucking moron.

    Now piss off.

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      “Some studies are done with funding contingent on a certain result, therefore all science is junk and science as an institution is untrustworthy”

    • JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Your argument may be better received with less hostility. People are going to criticise your ideas throughout life, however this reaction could be seen as a distraction to your focus on the subject. Everyone is at dismay at a topic, and many topics have the capability to become heated, yet you will be amongst greater levels of respectability for future interactions if you consider refraining from attacks today (even if you feel as though this is being done to you).
      Just trying to help, not scold. There’s always a better way to get your point across without making people dislike your comments, is what I’m essentially trying to get at.

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        First of all, I don’t give a fuck how I’m received, until I am satisfied my comment is in the common good. And I stand by this comment entirely. I am proud of my preceding comment, and if you don’t like it, I don’t care. Not one little bit. Other than caring enough to argue a bit obviously.