• Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    how is Canada smaller than the USA in this “equal earth” map when it’s supposed to display true areas? or is the pic in this post just shitty?

    • venuswasaflytrap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Canada (without the various arctic islands) is considerably smaller than the contiguous (sans Alaska and Hawaii) US.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s bigger even if you include Alaska (and Hawaii, but you can ignore Hawaii because it’s small).

      • yucandu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        We’re repeatedly told in school and all throughout our media that Canada is the “second largest land mass in the world”. Is that not true?

        • 13igTyme@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Land mass or country? Because the Americas make us the second largest land mass with Eurasia and Africa because the largest.

          • TheMadCodger@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Isn’t Africa connected to Eurasia? So we have the Americas and AfroEurasia plus some islands. Which is why “continents” has no meaning and is another social construct unless you divide them in a way that makes zero sense to anyone who isn’t a geologist.

            • Axolotl@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              We should divide the continents in:

              Continents: the actual land, so we have the Americas (i’d count them as one as they are almost one), AfroEuroAsia

              Sub continents: their definition is cultural so we have north and south america, Africa, Europe, Asia and Oceania

              Don’t take anything too seriously, i thought about this on two feets around 2 years ago and forgot about that until now

              • TheMadCodger@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                I know at the end of the day it doesn’t really matter, but it always rubbed me the wrong way when Europeans claim that The Americas are one continent because it’s one connected landmass, but somehow Europe is it’s own continent. North/South America at least came from different super continents and only recently collided. Europe (minus the Balkans) and Asia (minus Arabian and Indian peninsulas) have been together since at least Pangaea.

            • 13igTyme@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Which is exactly why I said Eurasia AND Africa. I also never said continent. I said LND MASS which is what was previously said.

              Work on your reading comprehension.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Smaller in area?

        According to wikipedia, these are the total areas of both countries:

        USA: 9,833,520 km2 Canada: 9,984,670 km2

        I am certain I am just misunderstanding the system behind this new projection but reading it is supposed to display accurate area, it seems Canada should show up bigger.

      • remon@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Canada is slightly larger than the US in total area. The US is a tiny bit larger when you just count land-area.

          • remon@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Canada total area: 9,984,670 km^2

            USA total area: 9,866,624 km^2

            Have a look a the respective 2nd digits of those numbers and consider that 9 is indeed bigger than 8.

            Source: Wikipedia.

            • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Total land area: 9,093,507

              You are counting ocean as part of Canada, a thing not represented on maps.

              Imagine being this condescending and wrong.

              • remon@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                10 hours ago

                No oceans were counted. But the total area does includes lakes and rivers.

                And I already said earlier that the US slightly larger when you just look at land area. It’s no where near 10% though.

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They look about the same size to me and they should be about the same size. So that checks out.