A juror in the trial of Lindsay Clancy is sharing new details about what he said happened inside the jury room that led to a mistrial in the case of the Massachusetts woman facing first-degree murder charges for the 2023 deaths of her three young children.

Nick Dargie, one of the three men on the 12-person jury, told ABC News’ Aaron Katersky that the lone holdout juror who prevented a unanimous verdict did not show any evidence explaining his vote.

“There was several times I would ask him to show us evidence or, you know, describe a witness testimony that helped to prove what he was saying, and … he couldn’t,” Dargie, 25, said in an interview Wednesday.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    It was never about acquittal, it was about spending her life in prison, or a prison for the criminally insane. Your MAGA holdout blew it entirely, and got her released. Good job.

    Once again, virtuosic incompetence at work.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The holdout was voting guilty. How is the 1 person voting guilty a “MAGA”. Honestly explain that. She killed those kids. Also, should MAGA be added to Godwin’s Law, because FFS.

      • davetortoise@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Lose the guilty/not guilty angle, she’s going to jail either way. He was insisting that she wasn’t legally insane when it happened. Despite a mountain of evidence.