A juror in the trial of Lindsay Clancy is sharing new details about what he said happened inside the jury room that led to a mistrial in the case of the Massachusetts woman facing first-degree murder charges for the 2023 deaths of her three young children.

Nick Dargie, one of the three men on the 12-person jury, told ABC News’ Aaron Katersky that the lone holdout juror who prevented a unanimous verdict did not show any evidence explaining his vote.

“There was several times I would ask him to show us evidence or, you know, describe a witness testimony that helped to prove what he was saying, and … he couldn’t,” Dargie, 25, said in an interview Wednesday.

  • Geologist@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 小时前

    The trial was never about if she killed the kids or not (everyone is in agreement she did it), it was about if she was legally insane when it occurred.

    • rollerbang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 小时前

      Certainly not everybody is in agreement that she did. Many people are blaming the husband.

      • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 小时前

        Idk why you got downvoted for this. You didn’t say you blamed the husband, you just stated a fact.

      • Wataba@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        20 小时前

        Give all the shit surrounding him, yeah I entirely believe he manipulated things to go his way. Embezzling donations while skimping on the kid’s gravestone (singular) after he cremated them in defiance of local law? That piece of shit is endemic of America as it stands.