A juror in the trial of Lindsay Clancy is sharing new details about what he said happened inside the jury room that led to a mistrial in the case of the Massachusetts woman facing first-degree murder charges for the 2023 deaths of her three young children.

Nick Dargie, one of the three men on the 12-person jury, told ABC News’ Aaron Katersky that the lone holdout juror who prevented a unanimous verdict did not show any evidence explaining his vote.

“There was several times I would ask him to show us evidence or, you know, describe a witness testimony that helped to prove what he was saying, and … he couldn’t,” Dargie, 25, said in an interview Wednesday.

  • chewypoops@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Imagine losing your job over it due to public backlash.

    Buddy, if you lose your job for serving on a Jury, you’re gonna retire to your mansion after the lawsuit.

    And the jury interviews are not mandatory. I honestly have no idea why these jurors are participating given how unhinged people are about this case. I would have kept my head down and gone the hell home once the case was over, rather than willingly hand my full name over to the media.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Buddy, if you lose your job for serving on a Jury, you’re gonna retire to your mansion after the lawsuit.

      That’s only true in a country with a functioning justice system.