A juror in the trial of Lindsay Clancy is sharing new details about what he said happened inside the jury room that led to a mistrial in the case of the Massachusetts woman facing first-degree murder charges for the 2023 deaths of her three young children.

Nick Dargie, one of the three men on the 12-person jury, told ABC News’ Aaron Katersky that the lone holdout juror who prevented a unanimous verdict did not show any evidence explaining his vote.

“There was several times I would ask him to show us evidence or, you know, describe a witness testimony that helped to prove what he was saying, and … he couldn’t,” Dargie, 25, said in an interview Wednesday.

  • chewypoops@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    John Oliver did a whole episode about “expert testimony”. I recommend watching it so that you don’t ask stupid questions like this again.

    Tl:Dr: “Expert” isn’t a title or a credential that matters, and “expert testimony” is often just complete horseshit.

    • Cypher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The expert in this case was a qualified and practicing psychologist, but if you looked it up first you wouldn’t make stupid statements.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Insurance companies have plenty of qualified and practicing doctors to say your prescribed treatment isn’t medically necessary.