• Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Religious law and civil law are not very different, the latter is based on the former, historically speaking.

    The difference is in who gets to judge and dole out punishments.

    • Sarah Valentine@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      Religious law and civil law are not very different, the latter is based on the former, historically speaking.

      Hammurabi’s Code disagrees with you.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        He derived his laws from the god Shamash. He just codified and imposed his interpretation. I am well aware of the stele, I’ve seen it! As sure as Shamash is my witness!

        • Sarah Valentine@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Have you got a citation for the claim that the laws were supposed to be the divine commandments of Shamash? All the articles I can find on the code or the stele just talk about the laws themselves with no mention of religious connotations.

    • iuminou@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      in theory the difference is dogmatic vs pragmatic but actually civil law is still mostly dogmatic just less so