This isn’t so strong on the coding part, but touch in some degree on this regard. The focus is on the data storage and access of data. I hope you like this post.

All feedback is welcome.

  • Shin@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    That was a little bit agressive. I’ll give you the opportunity to learn from your mistake and discuss what bother you in this blog post.

    • borosilicate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      I refuse to soften my tone. Typical piefed user.
      Tagged as Fedposter.

      “Please, Daddy government. Come own me.”

      No explanation needed. You are willingly rolling out a red carpet for fascist governments. The best way to deal with a fascist is zero tolerance.

      • Shin@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Did you read the post?
        It’s not that. It’s clearly a distrust (which is also part of the post).
        But the problem with trust can be solved with “how to access data”.

        Edit.
        Since you clearly didn’t read here a snippet

        […] if you don’t trust the government, the encrypted data is useless to the government, and we can audit it, including audit by private companies. So even if we don’t trust the government, it can work.[…]

        […] If a company can’t store my personal data, how can they access it? […]

        If you don’t trust, that’s fine. This is good. Government should be transparent, and should be auditable. To be honest we have close ideas, and we want the same thing (I guess), privacy and security for our data.

        (and keep our data away from datahouses and bigtech)