UI

  • LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    A lot of those are surplus and likely given to departments or sold for very little. That practice has contributed a lot to the militarization of police in America.

    That should all be taken away from them though. Most of their guns too. A country as developed as the US shouldn’t require an armed para military force to police its citizens and, arguably, the US doesn’t require one.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      The thing is they’re still a high financial drain. The military doesn’t give them the ones that are in good enough condition to still be useful, and they’re a maintenance nightmare.

      I worked for a city that accepted one, and it broke down while transporting it to the city the day we took possession and ended up costing the city 200 grand on its first day.

      • LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Oh, I know! It’s the equivalent of you or I being given a Peterbilt 579 and they we try using as a daily commuter.

    • Murse@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      A country as developed as the US shouldn’t require an armed para military force to police its citizens and, arguably, the US doesn’t require one.

      …we need an armed paramilitary force to police our politicians. I mean, on paper we have one, but in practice they seem to just follow a domestic enemy’s orders with no thought at all so long as that enemy is holding an office like POTUS.