Midnight@slrpnk.net to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoRight-Wingers Are Mad Anti-Welfare Ad Isn't Racist Enoughwww.rollingstone.comexternal-linkmessage-square54linkfedilinkarrow-up1416arrow-down19
arrow-up1407arrow-down1external-linkRight-Wingers Are Mad Anti-Welfare Ad Isn't Racist Enoughwww.rollingstone.comMidnight@slrpnk.net to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square54linkfedilink
minus-squaredogdeanafternoon@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoThat’s my point though, those numbers are meaningless. What if I gave you these numbers: White not on food stamps: 122.6 million Black not on food stamps: 33.2 million There are zero valid conclusions to be drawn. Analyzing the actual numbers, it seems a random black person is 3x more likely to be on food stamps than a random white person in the US. (0.25/0.13) / (0.38/0.59) = 2.99
minus-squareBubbaonthebeach@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoAlso, if there are 100 evenly distributed welfare recipients in a room, and you pick one at random, it is more likely they will be white than black.
That’s my point though, those numbers are meaningless. What if I gave you these numbers:
White not on food stamps: 122.6 million
Black not on food stamps: 33.2 million
There are zero valid conclusions to be drawn.
Analyzing the actual numbers, it seems a random black person is 3x more likely to be on food stamps than a random white person in the US.
(0.25/0.13) / (0.38/0.59) = 2.99
Also, if there are 100 evenly distributed welfare recipients in a room, and you pick one at random, it is more likely they will be white than black.