Says who? Why can there be nothing wrong? Why is 0.000000000000001% wrong too much for you? Why are you so intolerant of any potential moral question about the subject matter? Where do you derive this logic from? Why is it completely free from any amount of criticism? Zero criticism is allowed, according to “there is nothing wrong” logic. “Nothing” is doing a lot of work for that logic, and it demands that any amount of criticism should not be tolerated or entertained. It’s a major fallacy, in my opinion.
My uncle is a completely legal mexican immigrant. My aunt makes killer food. If he were to move to Europe, why is that unsustainable for them? The US was built on mass migration.Every immigration-related moral failure of the US wasn’t because it accepted immigrants, but because it rejected them. This is generation after generation here. Why is Europe incapable of solving it?
Maybe Europe is incapable of solving these issues. But if that’s true, then why is that acceptable to Europeans? If the problem is fundamental to the infrastructure of society itself, why should responsibility fall on immigrants to solve it rather than the society that calls itself liberal univeralist? You can’t just blame the right wing. It’s a societal issue as a whole if it just can’t work.
Says who? Why can there be nothing wrong? Why is 0.000000000000001% wrong too much for you? Why are you so intolerant of any potential moral question about the subject matter? Where do you derive this logic from? Why is it completely free from any amount of criticism? Zero criticism is allowed, according to “there is nothing wrong” logic. “Nothing” is doing a lot of work for that logic, and it demands that any amount of criticism should not be tolerated or entertained. It’s a major fallacy, in my opinion.
My uncle is a completely legal mexican immigrant. My aunt makes killer food. If he were to move to Europe, why is that unsustainable for them? The US was built on mass migration.Every immigration-related moral failure of the US wasn’t because it accepted immigrants, but because it rejected them. This is generation after generation here. Why is Europe incapable of solving it?
Maybe Europe is incapable of solving these issues. But if that’s true, then why is that acceptable to Europeans? If the problem is fundamental to the infrastructure of society itself, why should responsibility fall on immigrants to solve it rather than the society that calls itself liberal univeralist? You can’t just blame the right wing. It’s a societal issue as a whole if it just can’t work.
deleted by creator