• toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    Water ingress isn’t the issue & there’s been waterproofed ports for decades. They wanted to make devices thinner—but what value is it when its too thin to support a jack & made of materials that now require a case?

    • SqueakyBeaver@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s probably just the marketing reason. The realistic reason is probably that they want to sell you their brand of wireless earbuds that need to be replaced in a few years tops

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        That conspiracy is one I believe too. Seems too odd that all OEMs dropped their jacks at the same time they started selling buds.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        That’s it, right there. Artificial exclusivity, that’s what it always was anything else is an excuse to look or seem better or less scummy.