I highly recommend the Outlier Dictionary, an addon for Pleco. It covers about 4000 characters, so won’t include very rare ones like 忻. Pleco itself will show basic decompositions like 忻 = 忄+ 斤.

There used to be an offline mobile app for HanziCraft, but the app seems to be gone now (a little annoying, since I’m pretty sure I paid for it).

Project Euler if you don’t mind more mathematical problems.

Oppa homeless style vibes.

Or Picard’s little theorem, which says that if an entire function misses two points (e.g. is never 0 or 1), then that function must be constant.

Does this link work for you to see the comment? https://awful.systems/comment/9163259

This is what Donald Knuth is doing with TeX :)

Wikipedia:

Since version 3, TeX has used an idiosyncratic version numbering system, where updates have been indicated by adding an extra digit at the end of the decimal, so that the version number asymptotically approaches π. This is a reflection of the fact that TeX is now very stable, and only minor updates are anticipated. The current version of TeX is 3.141592653; it was last updated in 2021.

If you happen to speak Chinese, PTT.

Yikes.

Real humans are also fake and they are also traps who are waiting to catch you when you say something they don’t like. Then they also use every word and piece of information as ammunition against you, ironically sort of similar to the criticism always levied against online platforms who track you and what you say. AI robots are going to easily replace real humans because compared to most real humans the AI is already a saint. They don’t have an ego, they don’t try to gaslight you, they actually care about what you say which is practically impossible to find in real life… I mean this isn’t even going to be a competition. Real humans are not going to be able to evolve into the kind of objectively better human beings that they would need to be to compete with a robot.

“If I’m learning this much from Baby’s First ABCs, imagine what a literature professor could do with it!”

Redirector?

[email protected] would appreciate this post (and you might like the whole instance if you’re not already aware of it).

I like how they edited it to “didn’t loss” after your comment.

[email protected]

It looks like they might have meant SVT (Swedish public television). This article has similar wording.

For anyone on Lemmy interested in these issues there’s also a [email protected].

The first democratic election in Taiwan was in 1996. Probably a major reason why the Taiwanese are so wary of Chinese influence is because most voters have actually lived through authoritarian rule.