

You’re right, 1*1 line.
The revolution will not be televised. 🏴


You’re right, 1*1 line.


I prefer 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1.


There is a dirty bit indicating the disk was not ejected properly. It stays there until you use the “scan and fix” action. It doesn’t indicate corruption directly.


You can also use the sync command to flush cached writes and wait for completion, but I agree that it is a bit cumbersome.


New Technology File System

You could also think about the people using screen readers and other assistive technologies.
You can build a smaller form factor, like mini or micro ATX, but you might have a harder time to switch motherboards.

Is it worth it?
Or at least streamline “forget”: dismember
Embrace the ban. Never look back.
Reminds me of that southpark episode…


That wouldn’t be too bad. There could be a new permission for precise time.
In my experience this can be beneficial when committing and rebasing small and distinct changes.
Obfuscated JS.

Reminds me of nCage+


Yes, by default windows launches UAC prompts in the supposedly isolated “secure desktop” instead of the classical “interactive user desktop”.


It is not necessary for the attack and was used to illustrate the vulnerable app manifest configuration.
Planes belong in the cloud. Their manufacturer’s data does not.