So I suggested how you could do comms better, and also a sensible approach to defederation decisions, and that is your response.
Rather than thinking, “oh, is there some way we can do this better?”, just get defensive and blame the person giving feedback.
It’s human to err, but to refuse to learn, well that’s quiet something… I had expected a more mature response.
Considering my original point was about how users on Lemmy were an after thought. Not worth factoring in to decision or consulting, you sure aren’t really do a good job refuting it…
Lemmy world was the instance I originally joined when the whole exodus kicked off and others closed their doors. I was very grateful and had enormous good will for it. I never expected in the space of several months to have 180’d on it…
I appreciate you taking feedback on board, and I apologise if I was harsh about this and I didn’t mean for this to be aimed at you individually. It was a general frustration with general decision making and communication. It’s not the first time I’ve raised this and I care about Lemmy, it just gets frustrating when it feels the feedback is getting stonewalled.
I appreciate the position on consideration of refederation. it does make sense to consider it post 0.19.