I’m just gonna be open minded about it and not jump to conclusions. I could see the US gov making it into a big deal for reasons and I could see it being a balloon to take pics of bases, etc on the ground. Both seem like logical outcomes. I mean it could be a weather balloon but I sorta doubt it based on what I know about weather balloons (I’m an amateur weather nerd). But I could be wrong! I’ll admit that. Gotta keep an open mind.
I don’t want a war with China, that would be awful. I’m just trying to be realistic about it. Seems silly to go through the trouble to make a surveillance craft like that and it not even have the capability to beam back any data.
Can’t say I believe that one bit. With how small transmitters can be these days, why wouldn’t it have one? Sounds to me like damage control. Not a whole lot of details in the article anyway.
Probably have a lemon party. Hey hoooo!
God I hated all the joke comments that wound up at the top with thousands of upvotes. Just one big circle jerk on many serious topics. I’m sure it’ll still occur in Lemmy to some extent but hopefully the lack of karma will help keep it down.
I don’t have much experience with adguard but have been using 1blocker for years and have been happy with it. It’s of course not system wide ad blocking (it won’t block YouTube ads for example) but it works great in safari.
Yep it seems like once a decade this same thing plays out. Billions of dollars are spent by the feds to push for broadband, nothing actually happens except the funds get sucked up by the ISPs who claim it wasn’t enough for them to do any meaningful push for expansion.
The only way I see something like this working is if the federal government started their own ISP and did it themself. Of course that would be ripe for corruption too. Maybe if they setup a trust with specific rules that couldn’t be broke in terms of profits earned.
Of course. And you realize balloons can have an advantage over satellites in certain situations?