If it’s trained carefully, professionally, responsibly, with bonafide medical research data exclusively, I can see it being a boon to healthcare professionals. I just don’t know if I can trust that will happen in the timeline we live in.
This is what you get when parents absent-mindedly assume handing their kid a smartphone when they’re noisy is all it takes to raise them.
Well he started it.
I’d say that’s more of an AI industry issue than anything else. All AI art needs to be easily identifiable and sourced as such, but I doubt AI producers will want to hide tags on all their AI generated work though.
I thought I read that there’s no charge if on the same network. It’s just for accessing your files remotely from other networks.
Nope. Having lackeys involved at every step of the election process, and restricting ballot locations is what got you elected. The orange fuckwit.
Eh just get an AI to make AI versions of all the videos you want to watch on YouTube, then upload those. Then you wouldn’t be stealing anything obviously.
He should make Mexico a state and the border crisis will vanish just like that.
And tampering for cover-ups.
Oh so out of all the shit he’s fucked up, it turns out the nuclear weaponry are first thing he wants back?
Look at all those colors he’s showing.
And what if Egypt and Jordan just sends them all back to Gaza on military planes?
And what if Egypt and Jordan just sends them all back to Gaza on military planes?
No. The progress is actually just no longer having to hire real humans for “creative” work.
He’s doing something he’s not proud of and he can’t control it, so it must be society’s fault.
In other words, he’s suggesting his pockets need a little more lining.
Huh. He believes that cultural elites will be social media users. I wonder why he would be pushing that narrative…
There is definitely mental illness happening here, just not from the LGBTQ+ members.
It almost sounds like “Autumn Fall”
I wonder how long until this makes it to the toxic YouTube cycle.
This bring up an interesting question I like to ask my students about AI. A year or so ago, Meta talked about people making personas of themselves for business. Like if a customer needs help, they can do a video chat with an AI that looks like you and is trained to give the responses you need it to. But what if we could do that just for ourselves, but instead let an AI shadow us for a number of years so it essentially can mimic the language we use and thoughts we have enough to effectively stand in for us in casual conversations?
If the murdered victim in this situation had trained his own AI in such a manner, after years of shadowing and training, would that AI be able to mimic its master’s behavior well enough to give its master’s most likely response to this situation? Would the AI in the video have still forgiven the murderer, and would it hold more significant meaning?
If you could snapshot you as you are up to right now, and keep it as a “living photo” A.I. that would behave and talk like you when interacted with, what would you do with it? If you could have a snapshot AI of anyone in the world in a picture frame on your desk, who you could talk to and interact with, who would you choose?