He can’t be re-elected, and failed to secure an actual legacy.

Politics aren’t a game with winners and losers. When fascists rise to power, it’s not like in a soccer game where you say “well, better luck next year”.

People’s lives are on the line, and people might literally die fighting this shit soon. The idea that politics are a gentleman’s gentle verbal jousting club is pretty ridiculous.

About your enlightened centrist take about immigration… It’s never going to appease racists. What you suggest is exactly what France’s UMP and what Macron have done. Look where we are now.

I have honestly stopped buying tortillas when I learnt how crappy industrial tortillas are. I had no idea before that.

Il y a beaucoup de gens habitués au Français international qui résident sur l’île, je me demande si ça influe.

J’ai surpris des québecois dire “putain” ou “du coup”, c’était drôle 😁

(Scott Pilgrim vs the world, in case you’re wondering)

As the person who replied to you rightfully said, the persons you decry are mostly French, you said so yourself. The people you want to be “locked out” of the country cannot be deported - which country would they go to if they’re French and French only?

Your original point is wrong. Controlling immigration will do nothing to solve the insecurity RN voters perceive, because the North Africans they hate so much will still remain in France.

That was close enough!

It’s less confusing if you think of 70 and 90 as separate words without trying to analyze what their constituting words mean.

But etymologically, sure, it makes no sense.

Cinq

Fuck the guardian for lumping together fascists with leftist movements.

That, and their leverage is pretty weak. Small dogs bark the loudest.

I agree the comparison is asinine. But I keep seeing the tech bros make it, which is what I find so funny.

A hammer doesn’t replace a carpenter. That’s what I meant when I said that this won’t replace us: new tools are nice but they won’t automate everything. There are some jobs that have been completely replaced with advancements in technology. However, most of them have just gotten simpler and have evolved.

I do think LLMs are important, but I’m just laughing at the hype surrounding it, and all the grandiloquent claims made by tech bros.

The tech is interesting, no doubt. It’s very effective as a tool to generate text nobody reads, like the marketing speak on your random startup website. It still isn’t efficient on things where what is generated actually matters.

Your example with customer service is news to me, thanks. On my end, I remember the bad experience customers had with Air Canada. We’ll see how this grows in the future.

I had a discussion last week with people saying it’ll automate software engineering, which is not a given. You say “yet”, but I’m skeptical it’ll ever work. I can see it designing UI better than a non-specialist, but the flaws in quality means I can’t trust it anywhere near my code, even though I can see a future for it as a fancy static analyzer.

I’m sorry, I don’t understand what you mean.

Behold. This shit is supposed to take our jobs.

😁

Are they not a ChatGPT troll account or a bot?

This is an ironic ChatGPT answer, meant to (rightfully) creep you out.

Balzac = Ballsack

I’ll check OpenUI, thanks for the suggestion