Blue shift when?

People still play Apex?

Downvoted for the title. Not sure what kind of mouth breather trend that is, but it’s not lasting

This is non-partisan - if a liberal performed these crimes they’d be tried the same, and liberals would support it.

The only mental disorder here is your victim complex.

💯

Ya, even my Jettas physical buttons only increase the speed by 2km

That money was donated to the Democrats, no?

The Microsoft license plate is a nice touch

Another comment confirmed that it’s not introversion, it’s social anxiety. 🫠

I’m not an introvert, I just got yelled at a lot as a child instead of being hugged and now I have anxiety.

RIP 23344084

Reminds me of my zealously religious family members, they can take any argument and twist it into supporting their beliefs.

Aren’t the Republicans the reason why this began?

Does this apply to chromium browsers too?

It’s almost like there’s more men than bears.

You’re asking for statistics in bad faith of the argument. Seems like you’re the one slap-fighting here - if you wanted to actually engage in logical discourse, you’d have presented statistics yourself, which you have not.

There’s obviously no statistics on the rate of how many bear-human and male-female interactions happen. One rarely happens, the other happens billions of times per day. We can prove that bears are more aggressive and dangerous than humans though.

In one black bear study 88% of fatal attacks were a result of the bear being the aggressor. Note that black bears are known to be timid of humans, and notoriously not aggressive.

• https://sapl.ucalgary.ca/evds_info/content/black-bears
• https://bear.org/bear-facts/how-dangerous-are-black-bears

So, statistically even the more timid bear species are wildly more aggressive to humans than humans to bears. Unless you have data that proves that men are more aggressive to women than bears are to humans, this is the closest we get to proving men are statistically safer than bears.

deleted by creator

You’re just discarding every opinion as “toxic masculinity” which is actually worse than engaging in logical discourse.

I’ll do everything in my power to empower women and make them feel safe. This thought experiment has unfortunately been detrimental and used to attack men.

“It’s not you” - yes, and nothing I said made it about me at all. See how fast you went on the offense on a completely neutral comment? You should listen to your own advice and listen the points being made equally as much as you’re lobbying others to do.

So if men are statistically safer than bears and women’s safety is most important, then you agree “bear” is the incorrect choice?

I’m just trying to figure out all these incoherent memes.

No need to apologize, you’re the first person to actually calmly and willingly discuss the topic without completely dismissing being disagreed with.

I know you’re not the originally comment I was replying to, but you conveniently moved the goal posts. The context of the entire conversation is whether TikTok specifically should be shut down because it targets children for it’s own gain. You’re now arguing that social media in general has negative impact on society and children, which I agree with, but is completely skewing the conversation and was, in no way, the central point of the discussion.

So your opinion is that all social media platforms that deem to have negative affects on society should be shut down? Do you not see what’s wrong with that? You’re saying humans can’t decide whether or not they want to use social media. You should understand how absolutely absurd that is - that is a completely dystopian totalitarian dictatorship idea. It sounds like a chapter in 1984.