Yeah, fair enough for the general case. I do think their situation is a good one though.
Yeah, fair enough for the general case. I do think their situation is a good one though.
It worked for a friend of mine. They were friends, he kept trying to get her to date him and after a year of pestering she caved. They’re engaged now.
In the tree of life, flounders are a sub-sub-…-sub-species of bilaterally symmetrical animals: https://www.onezoom.org/life/@Holozoa=5246131?otthome=%40_ozid%3D1&highlight=path%3A%40Apionichthys_finis%3D3640785&highlight=path%3A%40Bilateria%3D117569#x2913,y-2310,w8.2796
Edit: let me preemptively be a pedant to myself and say that “sub-…-species” is wrong because “bilaterally symmetrical animals” is not a species. Flounder is itself a species AFAIK, not a sub-species of anything. It is a descendant of the common ancestor of all bilaterally symmetrical animals. There, now surely no one will find anything to be pedantic about :D
Sure, but what about Trick IMPLIES Treat?
Oh - a lemon o’ pee!
I assume this is from Scrubs but I don’t remember this scene?
It could be painful for a cat to walk on this. Or just deeply uncomfortable. I don’t see this as some silly thing.
Cute cat! Nice to see she has ways around it.
There are exceptions to every rule. Sometimes it ends up being “between five and 15” which is psychotic.
these amazing fears of engineering
😱
Sooner or later they’re going to become meander scars or oxbow lakes, when the river reconnects with itself.
So that man grabbed the sword from the blade and yanked it out of the mermaid’s hand without her realizing? It doesn’t add up.
That spelling does not feel real.
It’s close, but no, the first panel has more than one person
Theodore John Kaczynski, also known as the Unabomber, was an American mathematician and domestic terrorist.
Thanks, Wikipedia.
Could have been just an obvious spambot with no relevance, but that’s just a guess.
It looks like a super genetic stock image, and I always assumed that’s what it is.
I am beginning to think this community is not for me, as I need every other joke explained. But I haven’t given up yet… What is the joke here?
Reality is so unoriginal
I assume this is two statements: one without the parentheses, and one where each parenthesized word replaces the word before it. This is a compact, but borderline unreadable way to write two statements with the same structure. I hate it.
Edit: it makes a lot more sense in a live lecture, where the lecturer writes down the first sentence, then says aloud the second sentence while only replacing the necessary words on the board.