Please define imperialism and explain what imperialist ambitions China has.
- 0 Posts
- 581 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
Cake day: February 3rd, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
This must go so hard if you know literally fucking nothing about China.
The country that was a Nazi ally and didn’t drop the swastika from their air force insignia until 2025? Finland the country currently implementing mass austerity while giving tax cuts to the rich? That Finland?
To us. There’s a reason that even from Harvard’s research the government has a 95+% approval.
Direct elections reach the township and county levels where voters choose deputies to local people’s congresses. These grassroots deputies constitute the overwhelming majority of all deputies nationwide. Advancement to higher levels requires proven service at lower rungs, ensuring every national deputy has worked up from local material conditions and remains accountable to the masses below.
Grassroots legislative liaison stations and community consultation channels ensure mass input shapes policy at every stage, making democracy a daily practice not a periodic (meaningless) ritual. Whole-process people’s democracy embeds consultation and pilot programs into governance: policies are tested locally, refined through mass feedback, then scaled nationally. This grounds decisions in what we want and need.
All 55 ethnic minorities hold guaranteed representation in the NPC. Farmers and labourers comprise roughly 15% of deputies while professionals and technical personnel make up the remainder.
Even besides all that if you just look at what the Chinese government does as opposed to those owned by capital. Mass poverty alleviation, anticorruption at all levels, massive investment in socially profitable but monetarily unprofitable public services, deflating the housing bubble. These are not the actions of a government only looking out for a select few.
And also the CPC has over 100million members since 2024 that 1 in 14 people are party members not to mind those who aren’t but are active in consulting due to their position such as most engineers and scientists.
consists of 90 million members
It’s been over 100 million since 2024
You clearly don’t understand the purpose of the firewall and the online surveillance is no more than any other country but at least our government is accountable to us as opposed to owned by capital.
authoritarians
Thought terminating cliche used by the unintelligent and uninformed to avoid reckoning with reality beyond vibes.
Been a Liberal my whole life.
Then you’re not on the left dumbass
Marx did an entire chapter on it in Capital Vol. 1. Tools and machinery that theoretically should be a positive for workers are instead used to exploit them further.
No they’re pretty much the same. All the shills of capitalism(western economists) agreeing with you that capitalism is great isn’t really an argument for capitalism anymore than Nazis telling you how great Nazism is. Especially considering you’re wrong about most economists agreeing with you considering essentially all Chinese Economists don’t on top of all the western Marxian economists and other more fringe thinkers.
I think Nazism is better than the rest and most of the Nazis agree with me
Do you think before you just say things?
The present form of social media is not some neutral expression of “human nature.” It is the product of platforms designed under capitalist ownership to maximize engagement, advertising exposure, data extraction, and retention. That means the most emotionally provocative, addictive, rage-inducing, insecurity-producing content gets structurally rewarded because it keeps people scrolling.
Yes, adolescent minds are more vulnerable. Yes, social comparison can damage self-worth, especially among girls. But that does not refute my point; it supports it. Instagram does not simply “show girls images.” It ranks, recommends, amplifies, tests, optimizes, and monetizes content through engagement systems designed to put forth the most inflammatory emotionally charged content possible (bodydysmorphia tier influencers followed directly by weight loss drug ads).
Also scare mongering about “evil CCP surveillance” is fucking silly. Our government listens to and is accountable to us unlike your digital overlords.
Or you could expropriate it instead of banning it making all of this moot.
It has been proven that social media damages teeneagers’s development and self-worth. Or anyone here is going to attempt to deny this?
This is almost entirely a side effect of social media being privately owned and made to be as addictive rage inducing etc as possible as it brings the most clicks and profit.
Mostly from his “apology” and how he lied about how many times he did it and his excuse was he didn’t know it was wrong when he did it.
Yes I think a person doing blackface at a party and an actor playing a character doing blackface as a commentary on those who do are different. I think the second is still in poor taste but it is categorically different.
Looked up Robert Downey jr. Found Tropicthunder which I assume is what you’re talking about. The context between that and the Trudeau photo seems so far apart that it’s a meaningless comparison. Trudeau did blackface himself as himself because he thought it was funny and he’s a racist. Robert Downey appears to have done it as a commentary on doing it as part of a movie, I feel it was still definitely in bad taste but not at all comparable to if he just went to a party in blackface.
so why just not call em fascists
Well because the shoe fits and it highlights an interesting irony/hypocrisy of the Zionist project.
Justin is a supporter of facist state but not a direct fascist.
If you send millions in aid and weapons to Adolf Eichmann to implement his plan, his final solution so to speak, while endorsing his ideology, I have some unfortunate news for you about what that makes you. If you weren’t aware already (it’s more than just a supporter of X state).
So, a Zionist is the exact opposite of a nazi
Both extreme nationalist ideologies.
Both are expansionist.
Both promote othering certain groups as a common enemy.
Both are pro genociding the othered group.
Both support the idea of a chosen people who deserve to stand above the othered.
Really not seeing the exact opposite line you’re trying to push.
Edit:
What not reading anything Deng, Jiang, Hu or Xi wrote will do to a mf. Genuinely amazingly arrogant. Socialism is not Communism and due to living in reality pressing the magic communism button is unfortunately not possible thus we are stuck working through the transitionary period. I wish I had the confidence like you do to be so arrogant on something you know so little about.