211·
6 months agoI work with AI every day at my job. My buddy is a literal AI researcher and we hobby-build together too.
I’m not concerned with what you think is “objective truth” when you have no idea what you’re talking about.
- 0 Posts
- 3.08K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 6th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Yes this is an argument in my favor, you just don’t understand AI/LLMs enough to know why.
28·6 months agoPeople break laws all the time. That doesnt mean the gov supports them.
You may enjoy learning about the actual nuance here
https://israelpolicyforum.org/west-bank-settlements-explained/
That’s certainly an opinion you have
Removed by mod
the people stealing data
No one is doing this
Output doesn’t matter since it’s pretty well settled it’s not derivative work
Cool, discussion over.
I agree. For instance, it should be secured in law that you can train AI on anything, to avoid frivolous discussions like this.
Output is what should be moderated by law.
If it’s not a violation of copyright then this is a non-issue. You don’t need permission to read books.
Yet Israeli settlers are free to harass Palestinians and force them from their homes without consequence
That’s simply not true
Meanwhile Hamas literally has in their original charter that the reason they exist was to form an Islamic state, resist PA secularism, and fight a two state solution, because their goal was genocide of Israel.
at their expense
How?
Why do you have free reign to do the same?
AIs don’t learn as a human would, and comparisons can’t be made between the learning processes.
I think you’re going to have a hard time proving a financial distinction between them
There’s a third solution you’re overlooking.
3: OpenAI (or other) wins a judgment that AI content is not inherently a violation of copyright regardless of materials it is trained upon.
Hamas only exists because peaceful diplomacy with Israel was successful, and leading to a secular Palestinian state and a two state solution.
As this wasn’t a terrorist attack, a closer analogue is a recent war.
One estimate puts civilian casualties in the Battle of Mosul at around 40,000
1·6 months agoI could definitely see Trump supporters doing shit like this. I find it unlikely anyone at the Capitol, who has also been prosecuted, and given a light sentence, doing it again.
Aggressive prosecution is the precisely how you don’t let it happen again.
This has literally never been true about any crime
Are you for real.
Yes, Republicans notably used those riots to demand harsher penalties. You don’t remember the mythical burning cities?
This is “gold fringe on the American flag” level of nonsense
The irony is, the Trumpers want to be able to deploy this style of harsh and unjust justice at will.
So do people here arguing for harsh sentences because they don’t like them.
Mob Justice isn’t justice regardless of who the mob is
No, I don’t think it’s a good thing that traitors got less than they deserved
The vast majority of people on J6 were idiots in a mob situation, not traitors.
As OP said, fuck all of them, but aggressive prosecution here is not the way you want the law to work, the same way there’s no gain for imprisoning everyone who acted out of pocket during the Floyd protests.
You throw the book at the worst offenders, and you let people caught up in mob mentality off with a lesser sentence. That is justice working.
My entire premise hinges on the fact that these papers agree with me.