1·
21 minutes agoLmao the irony “I didn’t find their style or content particularly edificatious.” My partener in christ you are the unedificatious one!
- 1 Post
- 56 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 11th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
1·1 hour agoIf you wrote “King of America: Bernie Sanders” on a ballet, they’d throw the whole thing out? I mean, fair. Ballots are no place for having either fun or opinions :(
(If you mean don’t write him in for presidency then yeah obviously but as King?)
Okay but that is a very cool way to clean napkins
Has the time finally come to ban birds??
3·14 days agoIm stealing AI theist. That’s unreasonably clever
I’d have voted Third Party. Shame they’re Someone Else’s VP
Oh lmao, I misspoke. Thanks
SW on the crash: “We love safety. Nothing is more important than safety! Don’t associate our brand with negative feelings, associate it with safety instead :)”
Fucking lmao
3·23 days agoAre you aware of medicine? It’s pretty rude to say “im not disabled like you. It’d be wrong for you to not suffer,” as you did.
Now THIS is podracing
7·25 days agoSure, how far?
Wow, I can’t believe doom is so young! It’s been a cultural juggernaut my entire life, so it’s weird to think of Doom as “releasing.”
IF you define taking and shrinking a corpse’s. head as a violation of the rights of that corpse’s human rights, then yes. Of course, I disagree with most of what you asserted. I guess my first two questions are “Why does a corpse get rights?” and really just… generally… with the moral system thing. If one feels “the environment” is more important than a human, then they should be pro-kill-all-humans?? I’m not sure that tracks. Most societies have a moral system that’s a little more complicated than “destroy everything that’s not the most morally significant to protect it from being hurt by less moral things.”
Anyway, interesting question! Maybe we should talk about corpse rights as a new category of rights? Less important, perhaps, than living humans, but more important than nothing?
Burdle der warter?? Uh hardly evun knew the wurtur!
To be painfully pedantic, I expect to pay nothing for a sports dog. I’ve had neither the means nor the desire to pay to pay to enjoy a game.
…nonexistant?
Read this comment in OneTopic’s voice. Wild. I haven’t watched him in forever.
Yeah lmao. They already gave up the game in another comment here.
…I tried my girlfriends jeans on my high school because I am a woman. We are not the same :3
What a shit post lmao
…unless you’re serious, in which case, we should consider humanity’s tendency to categorize things. Gender expression and identify are very much bimodal and not binary.
Yeah, you basically nailed it. Trans healthcare for minors , if such a term would need defining would be the reduction of of permanent changes brought on by puberty. Generally, adults who started taking puberty blockers as a kid can either stop taking them later and have a (very likely mostly) normal puberty, or they can start pursuing more permanent changes, like hormone therapy.
A good chunk of the ‘debate’ is trying to separate normal people into ‘not trans’ and ‘lesser.’ What we want is really just comprehensive healthcare- same rules for everyone.
To your last point: trans-affirming surgeries have a vastly lower regret rate than most cosmetic surgeries, which is a very good reason to allow trans adults to choose to pursue them. The people passing these laws want a lower class. at no point does “protect trans children” ever come up in earnest.