• 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 28th, 2025

help-circle



  • Slow depends on the use case. If your main bottlenecks are in code that people have written highly optimized lower-level libraries for, it could be slower to roll your own implementation or use a less mature library in a different language. And in some cases it might not matter if you take 1 ms or 100 ms to do something.

    It works the other way too, and you have to weigh the pros and cons of your specific case when you choose a language. What level of abstraction do you want to work at, how stable do you need the toolchain to be, how familiar you are with the language, what’s supported in the language, how easy is it to do what you want, what’s the norm in the domain you’re working in, etc.




  • Canonical’s hiring process is wild. The number of stages is a deal breaker in itself, but the bizarre questions and the tests you mentioned don’t do them any favors either.

    I lost interest in the first stage with them asking for an essay about things like what kind of student I was in high school. The full email was massive.




  • arthropod_shift@programming.devtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldUm, actually
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think this paints all of atheism as a bad thing, just satirizes militant atheists who struggle with the fact that others can peacefully hold beliefs that are incompatible with their own. Reddit’s full of them, and they’re the equivalent of the evangelizing Christian that jumps on the “you need Jesus” spiel at the first whiff of non-Christian views.

    In my (atheist) opinion, the two are equally obnoxious.




  • Not moving the goalposts at all, you’re just missing the forest for the trees. The main point is that there are plenty of use cases that can use pure C with no assembly. I went with a simple example because I thought you’d have an issue with more complex examples like sending a notification over SMS via modem or providing a serial interface for sensor data.

    I don’t feel like arguing for the sake of arguing, though, and I feel like we’re in a pedantry spiral, so I’ll leave the conversation at that. Hope you enjoy your day.



  • Not necessarily. Let’s say that…

    • The stack pointer is defined in the vector table to point somewhere into RAM.
    • The reset vector points to some function _entry(), with a linker script to take care of its memory placement.
    • All other interrupt handlers are arbitrary C functions.

    You can compile only your C source file that defines _entry() and interrupt vectors, then flash the resulting firmware. No assembly involved, no external linkage, and no stdlib required.



  • Yeah, if your bootloader is expected to handle that you’re going to need assembly. That can also be delegated to the kernel, RTOS, or bare metal reset vector later on in the boot sequence, though. I had to write a bootloader for an embedded system like this once and it basically just applied firmware updates, validated the firmware, and handed control over to the firmware.