X eyes

🤣

I didn’t know that meme was still going.

Updated: 46 seconds ago

What kind of shit website is this. If you think this helps engagement or whatever, think again.

Blocked.

Thank you. I think I knew of disroot, but now I will bookmark them.

I also just remembered tangled, which would have been an interesting federated option, if a lot of people haven’t decided to hate anything that touched the AT protocol.

SourceHut

but he holds solid views ethically

😊

If I want to move away from GitHub, and I don’t like GitLab’s bloatiness, or Codeberg’s general vibe, what options do I have that are not run by someone in his basement?

I’m aware of radicale. And there is also a russian forge I saw some people flock to because of the DMCA mafia. But my repos are not that edgy 😉.

Fork zig as a side project, adopt the 6 weeks release cycle, create a roadmap with v1.0 to be released in 60 weeks, which is enough time for 3 alphas, 3 betas, and 3 release candidates.

Did Codeberg even have a slop repo problem?

I can’t imagine a person who chooses to use Codeberg will be bad at utilizing LLM’s in any case, especially since SlopHub is right there for the worst sloppers to publish in and maybe win some fake points.

This just feels like some people couldn’t stop themselves from doing some posturing!

To be fair, projects implemented in Rust and adopting the GPL/AGPL are just not that notable.

I mean, you can’t expect people here to have heard of, let’s say, that thing called Lemmy.

Fun is when you’re allowed to achieve what you want to achieve with less bullshit to worry about.

Or in more respectable technical terms, when you’re allowed to focus on core logic above everything else.

3. The bugs were always there. And some are just not happy with their incompetence getting surfaced/exposed.
4. 🟢 All of the above.

My friend just got dumped. And from what she’s telling me, he is the worst person ever.

kek

just because I try to regularly review places I go to

That’s what appears to be the problem. Quantity over some definition of quality makes it easy, and even creates the incentive, for some hustlers to go around soliciting money for positive reviews.

Pay and your shit is marvelous, the best in town. Don’t pay and you get 3/5 at best (I would presume smart hustlers don’t go for 1/5 often to avoid getting too deep into blackmail territory).

This is kind of funny, because in the “reviews” part of Google Maps, a “Local Guide” giving a restaurant ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ is usually a strong indicator that you shouldn’t eat from there 😉. That has been my experience, at least.

Is it just me, or is the “among others” in the title made it sound like an outbreak, instead of referring to other projects?

Dare I ask, what ssh thing?

Side Note: It was already believed that SSH encryption was broken by state actors since the first NSA leaks. So, people should at least always use it over another encrypted channel anyway.

Does it qualify as cognitive dissonance maintaining a fork of a partially vibe-coded product to remove vibe-coding tooling because you hate vibe-coding?

imagine giving apps SMS access in stock roms

skill issue

People can distrust whomever they wish to. But hallucinating factually inconsistent and logically incoherent theories around that distrust is another matter.

What part does switching from dual-licensed software to GPL-licensed software to MIT-licensed software play in an evil plan? Are there sky angels out there preventing evil doers from adding backdoors to binary packages of AGPL-licensed software in particular?

My innocent self thought these “theories” only get purported by YouTube/X teenagers. I guess I was wrong.

sudo is not GPL software, chrony didn’t even complete a year as a default choice in Ubuntu, and gpsd actually adopts a BSD license. Read the comments @[email protected] wrote in this thread.

Freedom in the west is a goal in and of itself that acts as a moral compass when judging tools and products. Islam values freedom, but it is not a end goal, nor is it a moral precept to base your ethics on.

This is the kind of hubris that started in the Ta’weel era (a good equivalent English word escapes me. In Arabic: “عصر التأويل”) after the rashidun period and the Tanzeel era, and accumulated in the full abandonment/replacement era (“عصر التبديل”).

The whole point of true monotheism is to be only subject to Allah and no one else. No kings. No clergy (itself an anti-islamic concept). No “intellectuals”…etc. In other words, “freedom” is at the core of Islamic creed, it’s not even something to be discussed at the jurisprudence level.

The whole point of finality of religion including sharia, is that no one can add/append to it. This relates to additional restrictions even more than additional allowances (read about the limits of restricting what’s allowed if you wish “تقييد المباح”, although that’s a luxury subject nowadays since there are no legitimate states or heads of states around).

The rest of your comment is also full of the same hubris and incoherence common in the two downfall eras, especially the abandonment/replacement one (still ongoing). The maqsidi approach immediately gives that away (the modern abandonment/replacement take, which al-Shatibi is not responsible for).