Bro I’m early 30s and I was like “OHHHH SHIT MY CHILDHOOD!” haha
Bro I’m early 30s and I was like “OHHHH SHIT MY CHILDHOOD!” haha
Tell me you don’t understand directionally or literal numbers without telling me…
Yeah, his model gave her less of a chance than most others and their podcast constantly, over and over, warned people that this means Trump wins three elections if you run it ten times. People who wrote 538 off because it didn’t call the election for Trump are some of the dumbest mouthbreathers you’ll run into.
Wait do other people really not get that this is sarcasm?
I feel the same way about “every accusation is a confession.” It’s such over simplified, sixth grade mean girl bullshit. Buuuuuuut it hasn’t been wrong lately, which is annoying lol.
A lot of people miss that NY is a liberal state, but in the sort of “commercial liberal” way. It’s basically the embodiment of old school moderate liberalism. I’m obviously simplifying, but NY is Democratic, but not necessarily progressive.
Lol joke’s on you asshole, recently more people raised in the suburbs and country have moved to cities, and more minorities and leftists own guns. It’s not 1980 anymore, good luck.
Rachel fucking Maddow probably lol
“The people doing this boycott are just anti-Rhodesia nutjobs and there aren’t even that many.” -some jackass in 1975
Removed by mod
No he doesn’t realize that, the Foxosphere hasn’t adopted that position yet.
No just like, not a fill in the blank type headline. Everything doesn’t need to include slammed or end in here’s how, here’s who, here’s what, etc. Nothing against you, you’re just sharing the article, but whoever is in charge of drafting headlines for three last decade have really dropped the ball.
Just like “slammed,” if an article ends with “Here’s who…” or “Here’s what…” then I’m not fucking clicking. Why. Just why.
Hey now, don’t forget the worst invasion of illegals that we’ve ever seem, for the 270th year in a row…
“Policy that has worked the world over” conveniently ignoring that the countries you’re obliquely referring to are not the ones without guns, but the ones with meaningful social mobility and instead you’re pretending that the stronger correlation is guns. Across time and space, low social mobility among young men, specifically, correlates with rates of violence. But instead of trying to actually address the difficult issue here you’re just going to click those pretty little red shoes together three times and wish for a single policy that solves this extremely complex problem. Just unbelievably childish and naïve. Nothing but virtue signaling, hollier than thou bullshit.
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I mean CO would be the first to do that, correct? Honest question.
Vote for increasingly tight background checks, micro stamping, and other solutions that don’t rely on the delusional and childish belief that only the batshit crazy police should have guns? What are you doing about it? I’m gonna take a shot in the dark here and guess voting for the public policy version of a miracle cure. How responsible.
I’m in the “pro gun crowd” and I, and many of us, absolutely do not think he should own a gun. Many of us very much support keeping firearms out of the hands of people with a history of violent tendencies and torturing animals. What are you talking about?? That’s like, one of the few things that the “pro gun crowd” and “gun grabbers” actually agree on.
Actually I’m the oldest! I just had a lot of games that weren’t exactly cutting edge at the time lol