This one right here. ⬆️

Uhhhhhhhh…

Yup, they are 100 times as embarrassed as you are.

This is a very important point, yes.

You’re right, but I’m confident he’ll get there in the end.

The person you’re arguing with made the point that if you hold the ones who voted against the bad thing happening as partly responsible, by the same logic, you should hold people who voted for Clinton in 2016 partly responsible for the election of Trump.

I don’t think you can have it both ways. Either the entire USA including you is responsible for Trump becoming president and the entire SCOTUS is responsible for today’s ruling, or you’re not responsible for Trump winning and the three dissenters are also not responsible for today’s ruling.

I get that you’re angry, and it’s a good day to be angry, the day that they ended democracy, but maybe be more selective about who you’re angry with and sometimes try to check if maybe there are some valid things people can disagree with you about.

More treasonous than inciting armed insurrection?

Surely Trump just appeals to the SCOTUS and they free him in line with today’s ruling?

Democracy in the USA ended today. It will be in the history books about the end of democracy.

He won’t. Too honourable.

Just a reminder to our American cousins that in British English, trump means the noise an elephant makes but also to fart: “Sorry I trumped.” Donald the Trump is a noisy noxious unwanted thing on the world stage.

Wise person: “Those who do not know history’s mistakes are doomed to repeat them.”

Actual Nazis: Great idea. Let’s burn some books.

I actually laughed out loud. Thank you for sharing.

You’re right, yes.

Nastiness. The clear connection, at its heart, it’s nastiness. Lack of compassion. Zero empathy.

What would Jesus do? Not this. Absolutely not this.

I’m not versed enough in that industry to speak authoritatively on it.

In the tax avoidance industry? No, me neither.

I’m not sure why you lend such credence to stuff churned out by people with such obvious and clear self-interest in the assertions they’re making. “Grown-ups taking over running the country from incompetents and disaster capitalists spells trouble for the filthy rich who may well leave the country” is such a well-worn and nakedly self-serving line I don’t know why you take it so seriously. Like, their whole thing, literally everything they do is to reduce tax for the ultra wealthy. Of course they’re not going to be keen that the economy-crashing “reduce taxes at the top end” party are leaving government, they might have to work even harder than before to exploit a shrinking pool of loopholes. I lost my tiny violin, so I’m all out of sob-story music for them.

I don’t understand how it is that you can be this full of hate and so utterly devoid of compassion and empathy.

So plenty of FUD from a firm that… Helps wealthy tax avoiders avoid tax. OK.

Don’t judge others.

Love your neighbour, and this means anyone in need, especially ones from ethnicities your nation shuns.

Look after the poor, the widows and the foreigners.

Pay your taxes.

But seriously, number one and number two are love God and love your neighbour, according to Jesus, and he got really really cross about the religious leaders making up all kinds of rules for everyone else to follow, and for making the temple all about the money.

He also said that you can’t love God and money.

It’s just not a very Republican kind of line of morality, you can see why they’re rejecting it.