https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh-My-God_particle

Why not use tranquilizers? Field biologists use them to check up on wild animals, why can’t they use them on “criminals”?

My southwest flight will be on a max 8 both ways. Wish me luck.

If you don’t maintain your fleet, eventually they’ll all fall out of the sky

Aside from the security risk, they’re probably mitigating the amount of traffic incidents that are bound to occur when the crappily coded cars enter the market

I don’t get it. When does it become morally acceptable to block traffic?

Between Just Stop Oil and Stop Arming Israel, they both have equally valid points. So why is it that blocking the Golden Gate Bridge is “based” while blocking various feeder roads in Britain makes you a twat?

Edit: messed up the titles

Just like the good ol’ days after 9/11

It’s like the US’s “less than lethal” options in the 70s

Another interpretation, and an interesting catch-22, is that they are simultaneously the best and worst contenders for presidency. The act of wanting the presidency warrants at least some ulterior motive, but also requires at least learning how to run a country at the bare minimum. Without the latter, you just can’t run a country.

Yes and no. On one (nihilistic) hand, you live to die. The other hand (the better one) is that you give your own meaning to live. Fill in the spaces between the living, dying, and suffering parts, to make them seem insufficient in comparison. Just like the time you spent with your cat.

Nothing makes either side any less true - it’s all up to interpretation. For your mental health, though, it’s better to follow the latter.

It could also be the fact that a lot of modern presidents aren’t fit for presidency as much as they can mislead the people. In a perfect world, you could’ve voted for Nader and not regretted it, because you’d have known that the people that surrounded you weren’t naive. Personally though, I feel like raeganomics was to blame for too many of America’s problems.

An agenda for who? I’m very interested in who you think I am.

Yes. Albeit, I never mentioned anything about speech. It’s a bit weird that they immediately jumped to that. I’m mostly mentioning the fact that his senior moments severely outweigh other presidents. I mean, come on. The guy is 81.

I just don’t get how people are driven to pick the lesser of two evils when there’s much better options out there.

He has a card for meeting with ambassadors which literally says, in short form, “sit down. Say hello. Answer questions. Leave”.

He forgot how to stand on a bike. Hell, he forgets how to walk up stairs sometimes. Even walking on the ground, he sometimes ignores secret service instructions. He’s 81. 81. And I’m getting flak for calling him out?

I can get people defending Greg abbot for being disabled, because that’s not the point of his dilemma. This is different, because he is literally too old to be fit to serve.

Edit: I also never said anything about speech, where were you getting that from?

Holy shit, I thought the us couldn’t get any worse.

I pity you, having to pick between a dementia patient and a man whose only intent is to turn the country into a failing business, with God as his witness.

Fair enough, but raspberry pi (trading) Ltd is the one that’s mostly in control.

Uh, no? It’s the other way around?

Because that’s the non-profit organization, not the for-profit business.

No.

Raspberry pi’s business sector (aka Raspberry Pi Trading) has never been non-profit. That’s who is going for an ipo.

Raspberry pics community sector (aka the Raspberry Pi Foundation) is the non-profit, and will remain as such.

Edit: Here’s my source.