It’s a shame they fixed Cyberpunk.
Mean leftist who believes in magic genders
It’s a shame they fixed Cyberpunk.
Right, but what about the mimic plant? It mimicks whatever plant is near it. And it can mimic plastic plants. https://www.vox.com/down-to-earth/2022/11/30/23473062/plant-mimicry-boquila-trifoliolata
Children always looked stupid, you just didn’t notice it when you were a child
Iron Man: they are executives at the same company that developed the tech
Black Panther: the bad guy literally just couped the government of Wakanda
Ant Man: the villain is a former business parter of Pym
Dr Strange: they trained at the same monastery and the bad guy trained for longer
I think these fights are boring most of the time, but they’re not implausible. They have plenty of plot justification.
Also the character who copied Hawkeye was a girl who was inspired by his heroism and spent years learning archery and martial arts and still sucked at being Hawkeye when she met him
There’s one example of freezing in space done right. In the finale of JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure Battle Tendency, Kars gets shot into space and tries to course correct with air jets, but then he starts freezing over, air jets first.
In Phantom Blood, we were shown Dio’s special technique for freezing people by evaporating the moisture on his skin. This is to introduce viewers to the fact that boiling a liquid makes it colder. Kars froze because the moisture in his air jets boiled in the vacuum and became freezing cold. Kars didn’t know this detail of physics because he’s an ancient Aztec.
Qapla’!
How about “speak friend and enter” in elvish?
Yeah, I bet. The internet hates nuance, it hates when someone corrects their “own side” or seeks a truth independent of sides. I got banned 6 months ago from Hexbear for saying there’s such a thing as gender neutral pronouns. There was a lot of discussion about the topic, and it emerged that there were two different interpretations of what I said, and they both hated me. Half thought I was advocating they/theming everyone, and hated me for refusing to gender binary people. Half thought I was advocating they/theming nobody, and hated me for insisting on gendering nonbinary people. Neither of those two positions is my position, and of course they’re mutually incompatible with each other.
But these two sides both hated me, and teamed up with each other without ever realising they had completely different ideas. Because, as you say, the fact I had a small disagreement or clarification of their views meant I had to be the enemy. Whereas those two sides had completely different views, but they didn’t voice their disagreements to each other, so they were able to assume they were on the same side. Have a nuanced position like mine, in questions of religion or gender or anything else, and both sides will team up to kick your ass.
I remember years ago back when I was an atheist, I read someone on Reddit or somewhere saying the fact humans get sleepy after sex is proof of evolution. They said it proves evolution because humans go to sleep when their job is done, which is to reproduce. Now, at the time I was an atheist, and of course I still 100% believe in evolution today, but that random person’s comment stuck with me for years.
See, the idea that people go to sleep after sex because their job is done makes for a good story. I don’t know if it’s true, but it sounds good. Thing is, the good story isn’t exclusive to evolution. Bible says Elohim told humans to go forth and be fruitful. So if Elohim had created humans, he would have made humans sleepy after sex too. Obviously.
This random guy on the internet whose comment I read years ago, he saw a piece of evidence that made a good story for his views, and he didn’t actually check whether it was evidence against the opponent’s views. I think he just assumed that the two models had to be opposed in every single way and any evidence for his views was evidence against the opposite. He was basically the same as the banana guy.
You know the banana guy? "Bananas are proof of Deus because they’re perfect for eating ". Guy didn’t do his research and didn’t realise humans made bananas the way they are. He found a good story and didn’t check if it was also a good story for the other guys. Same as the sleepy sex guy.
You gotta be able to see the other side’s viewpoint enough to check whether your evidence can be explained by their views, or if you’re just embarassing yourself. That’s the bare minimum of understanding other people’s views. Without it, you end up like the banana guy.
And a web app for accessing first aid resources should have a tight process.
Corvidae, huh? So it’s a crow?
Can I see your story? Something about this whole event grips me. I can’t learn enough about it.
There is never any good reason to point a gun at someone you are not currently trying to kill.
Yes there is. The good reason is being an actor who is playing a character who’s trying to kill someone.
Actually, he didn’t pull the trigger. It was a revolver and he fired it by pulling the hammer back.
She learned how to be an armourer from her dad and it seems like he was the one who provided her a live round. She had no idea what she was doing, he’s a bad armourer and a bad parent who raised and taught another bad armourer.
Yeah, it was an AD. Armourer handed the gun to AD, AD shouted “cold gun” and handed it to Baldwin. Baldwin treated it like a cold gun and got someone killed. AD pleaded guilty.
I couldn’t find any reference to them plinking cans onset. The version of the story I read says she got the rounds from her dad, and they were “reloaded” rounds that had originally been dummies but were made live by hand. Basically her dad’s a careless armourer who mixes reloaded rounds with dummies and didn’t teach his daughter to check her ammo.
Nah. Only 50F to 115f is usable. What kind of weird ass datapoints are those? I mean 10C to 45C are just as random, but at least it aligns with something practical. At least I understand that 200C is twice what it takes to boil water. I have no idea how hot 400F is supposed to be.