Which rules?

Additionaly u are giving them more visibility, as uncommented statements are creticless, people rather read those.

Well dont stop, continue. Only in dialogue can we defeat our differences.

Otherwise you seperate and isolate people, and strengthen they’re belives.

There are people that you can show all the facts and logic and proof and they are not going to believe. Those people I refer to as stupid. ( I dont call em that. No need to be rude). Dont be such a person yourself.

Hence, always try to engage in dialogue and be flexible enough in your worldviews. But also know some people are not and there is nothing you can do.

But other people reading this will see you be right.

Nazbol? What does this dead movement have to do with anything?

That is true we need to fix the problem. So in your analogy you would’ve stopped giving the person pain medication?

And how is the person crippled by pain supposed to stand, walk or excercise without pain medication?

I get it addition to pain medication is bad. I would assume most people know that, even those addicted. But the alternative is those people succumbing to pain, which would prevent any improvments.

Hence, yes I agree. Just throwing around money is not going to be the solution, but so is also not giving any.

Zuber eats argument can be criticized without using Ad Hominems.

Nice that the SBU chief told in an interview on the 27th how the planning and execution of those murders was done. So there is your link.

Tho I do not share the views of the blogger. Innocent people that where not involved in any hostilities did get harmed.

Additionaly deliberate killing of noncombatants based on they’re race, views or political motivations, etc. using military funds is a warcrime.

Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.

Wikipedia

Please go inform yourself before participating in any discussion.

I agree that incorrect administration of welfare can lead to that. But thats also the politicians job to manage.

Thats also comparable to saying I don’t visit doctors I fear a mistreatment.

Nice ad hominem.

Please read the scentence again. There is a “EVEN IF” and not a “THAT”.

Killing civilians by planting bombs in statues is not asymetric warfare.

No, but you can clearly see the facial structure, clothing, shoes and other factors that any agency would use for.identification.

“Nowdays there are many new dangers in the forest, like furries and feet lovers.” ~ Bigfoot

Wendigoon’s serial killer tierlist. Makes me also sleepy.

You do. But not the politicians who actually get it into law. Also who has decided you are the spokesperson of the pro life movement?

Maybe, but even if the terror attack just pure Ukrainian special forces. It was done under the ISIS flag. Hence there is a threat of a new ISIS attack.

(To show that they are still there or to proof how they actually behave.)

The people that have done the deed where definitly ISIS. But there where many people involved behind the scenes and someone payed for it.

ISIS usually ideologically subverts individuals.

While Ukraine is involved in numerous killings, terrorism and uncountable sabotages inside Russia, (mostly) by either paying or convincing locals.

(I doubt it was the US/ Europe. The CIA/ Europe would have no gain from this.)

But there is no definitive proof (so far) of who actually orchestraded it, so it could be the usual suspect or the obvious one.

Most people involved with the sbu’s sabotage and terrorism inside Russia where not Ukrainian.

Bruh. There is video footage of it. You can go the parts of the internet where such footage is shared and check for yourself.

Hyper plays

“We have city to burn…”

Closes courtains.

Sad Johnny noises

No, the therapist came to this conclusion on his own by seeing his mother.

Nice attempt at disinformation: Troll harder, fuckwit, Russia had legitimate reasons to invade. Dosn’t make it right tho.

Aint solving a conflict diplomaticly by adressing only one side. And to solve the conflict by force in favor of Ukraine is already impossible without provoking nuclear war.

So either, there will be diplomatic solution, or you and I go to fight for our overlords.