Should is the key word here. You pay a lawyer to find out, which probably isn’t worth it.
Should is the key word here. You pay a lawyer to find out, which probably isn’t worth it.
Why is that? I’ve read them referred to as dark matter developers (forget where I read this, maybe a book many years ago). They’re out there, they make up a majority of the field, yet they leave no trace because they do not blog, post on SO, or back in the day forums either as questioners or answerers.
I’m don’t disagree. Good developers use the tools to do better, but its incremental not revolutionary improvements for already competent developers.
I think I could have states my opinion better. I think LLMs total value remains to be seen. They allow totally incompetent developers to occasionally pass as below average developers. Is that good or bad? I don’t know. What an average and excellent developer can do with LLM assistance is less clear. Certainly it can help those developers in some situations.
There are a LOT of superficial devs out there. You dont even have to be interviewing junior devs. Plenty of them out there at medium and senior levels. They existed before LLMs were spitting code like today, and this will undoubtedly lower the bar for bad developers to enter. It remains to be seen if this can help the gold developers in a meaningful way.
Link? I’d like to see. Always amusing to see that kind of thing.
Welcome to the Internet. Pontification is all we’ve got. Now we’ve got LLMs regurgitating the old pontifications to make new ones.
I came in with your same expectations and found the same shit. Just some opinion formed on the basis of “concern”.
Same here. That works well for desktop, they also have an electron app that wraps their web ui into a desktop app and it works well enough. Bridge works very well for any other desktop app you’d want to use.
The only trouble is that on mobile your option is their app or the web interface, no ability to use alternative apps. The mobile app is good, but not great.
Overall its a good service and I’m happy bit you need to know these limitations going in or it could be frustrating.
When its not optional to publish email only, the proposed solution is pretty reasonable imo.
Hiding a camera in person would be actively malicious if the other party doesn’t know. Having a zoom recording leaked is less actively.
Does it actually improve the pairing experience? I am skeptical it will make any difference.
I generally agree, but with robocopy they went too far with this, because the status code doesn’t work the way you expect, and you’ve got to script around it.
I’m not even that conflicted, those cheering any government censorship are misguided at best.
So is Voyager (also on fdroid, but is just a pwa) and its miles ahead of the native Lemmy UI.
You can definitely ‘chat’ with copilot, like other llms as well as the inline editor auto complete.
Ability to zero in on location is definitely the thing that keeps me on the platform. I can’t say its always cheaper, it maybe in some cases but its often equal or higher than a budget hotel in my experience. The fact that I can get a unit with a kitchen and within walking distance of a few of my planned vacation activities is the reason I check it out.
I have been able to live with everything else, but this is the one that kills me every time.
Yeah. That post has over 900 comments, which is rare even for an Ars article. Mostly negative sentiment, which I get.
I wonder if this is something that will help bring Firefox usage numbers up to what they should be. Since so many Firefox users are privacy focused and resist fingerprinting, a lot of users don’t show up in usage numbers. Maybe there aren’t enough of them to make a difference, I don’t know. Thus is the only non-nefarious usage I could think up.
It seems that comment went right over your head.