![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/4c3a6c37-fe56-4144-a21b-d492db959be7.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Not with that attitude!
I Am Incredibly Strong & And Handsome
Not with that attitude!
deleted by creator
It is my understanding that a lot of thought and care is put into the design language and appearance of applications and frameworks. However the same level of consideration is not usually afforded to skins and themes, which are often released an never updated again. This can cause usability issues and sometimes even breakages. Of course, people are free to do as they please with their computers.
I do not trust the CEO, the company, or the product. Here are a couple links, I’m certain there are more:
Be aware that Brave is essentially a scam and there are other privacy-focused browsers that might suit your needs.
Luckily Wikipedia articles typically include sources:
https://www.osnews.com/story/24882/the-history-of-app-and-the-demise-of-the-programmer/
This is simply not true.
To add, you could have looked this up before posting a hostile comment on a relative newcomer’s post. This is how linux communities develop reputation of being exclusive & unfriendly.
Perhaps, but it’s not a technical term. And it’s not the correct term from a technical perspective either.
AI is a pop culture term that has been in use long before practical machine learning or large language models. It already has a known definition which resembles artificial general intelligence or AGI. It is being applied to ML and LLMs for marketing purposes.
During COVID and in the immediate years after their production started used Tesla held value well.
This was the case for all vehicles at the time due to the supply chain shortages.
As a non-sciencey person, can someone explain the chasm of ignorance?
This is Chinatown (Spadina/Nassau) in Toronto. I bought one of my first bikes from Uncle Jacob’s.
Hold up, let me just make up some numbers real quick to prove how wrong you are!
SourceHut is crap. I’ve found that just because something is open source it doesn’t mean it’s automatically good.
Yes, but the article states that the bond was collateralized by $175 MM in cash—so it must have already been cash or liquidated anyway.
What a title.
The words that come next will shock you!
Technically not misogyny—just good ol’ fashioned objectification.
This is an insane take based on absolutely nothing.