I’m a bit surprised at the ieee hosting nontechnical articles. How long have they published “news” in this capacity? Archive.org suggests 2021 but it may have been earlier. Seems a poor decision for an ostensibly professional website to branch out like this. God, I hope .gov sites never start hosting blogspam.
sourced information is downvoted
Every time. Still a net positive despite the issues involved in live oral vaccines. If you argue otherwise, you’re being contrarian.
:0
And furthermore
:O
But wasn’t the API situation caused by revenue lost through the absence of advertisements in 3rd party apps? Are you trying to tell me that faultless angel spez, former moderator of /r/jailbait, misled me?
“Thaddiffer, I do say, what are those Frenchmen doing across the hill?”
“My dear Billiam, I believe they’re attempting to flank us. Shall we preemptively prepare a ceaseless 500 grape shot barrage to render them, the landscape, and everything else within a quarter mile into an unidentifiable vapor?”
“No, no, we shan’t be rude, we simply must offer them first volley. Anyone for tea in the meantime?”
*raucous agreement*
(Yes, I know what you’re referencing but this is magic “everyone gets a cannon” canon)
I mean, if a military were to have the financial means to offer a cannon to every soldier, they would. Economics are the backend of every war. In 600 BC, a flexible sword would be both far more expensive and less effective than a spear, which is the crux of my question. I only read the wiki after my comment so I take back halberds. 7355608 proposed an interesting use case in a casual carry belt that feels reasonable.
Given that spears and halberds exist, what’s what’s the utility? Hidden for assassin shenanigans?
I thought I was clear in my attempt at blindsiding that user by first defending them and then disagreeing with them in both substance and spirit. My b