Exactly. So I am curious why OP considers it remarkable that “neither left nor right” is not what it seems.
As for me, I might consider someone from a different country with different politics, like Japan perhaps, to be neither. Or someone who lives under a rock and doesn’t pay attention to the news.
Please describe someone who could be considered neither left nor right. Is it possible you are viewing the absence of left-wing qualities as being right-wing?
augh it’s annoying
1, sometimes 2.
Does anyone else have the problem where sometimes a bit of TP sticks to your labia? especially the 1-ply
there’s no “but” – this is exactly the point the author is making.
The article is NOT satire – it’s provocative. The author argues that world hunger benefits the rich. Capiche?
I hope the UN restores the article.
Interview with author: https://fee.org/articles/un-deletes-article-titled-the-benefits-of-world-hunger-was-it-real-or-satire/
that’s not satire. He unironically, disapprovingly, argues that this is the real state of the world.
What does BLOB stand for?
heh, it’s alright. in this case I suppose I come off as the thread-hopper :P
See discussion here. Open Source is a valid term for this. Don’t police perfectly innocent and common use of language please.
Oh my god, stop being a proscriptivist about this. Open source is not the same as free software. You’re thinking of FLOSS.
no it isn’t. The old versions are still GPL. permission from contributors was attained.
Note that
So what’s the controversy, really?
what’s underage for hrt? like… 12?
The conversation was not originally about OSD; I had just mentioned it.
You do too by using the term FOSS instead of FLOSS
Touchée. But FLOSS the term only emphasises even more: there’s open source software, and then there’s free/libre open source software – note the distinction.
This I can believe tbh. It’s a very useful tool in the hands of an expert. Otherwise it’s like giving a chimp a gun.
Maybe this is why I am surprised at people’s hatred of ChatGPT. It’s borne of misuse of a tool for experts, like newcomers struggling with a C++ compiler error.
like, a video of Tao giving a demonstration?
LLMs are basically just good pattern matchers. But just like how A* search can find a better path than a human can by breaking the problem down into simple steps, so too can an LLM make progress on an unsolved problem if it’s used properly and combined with a formal reasoning engine.
I’m going to be real with you: the big insight behind almost all new mathematical ideas is based on the math that came before. Nothing is truly original the way AI detractors seem to believe.
By “does some reasoning steps,” OpenAI presumably are just invoking the LLM iteratively so that it can review its own output before providing a final answer. It’s not a new idea.
Your explanation is wrong. There is no reason to believe that “c” has no mapping.