Is that a NOPE reference?
Is that a NOPE reference?
A pseudotriangle. Or a you looking for the size of the area?
Maybe the one guy was just telling the story of how he overheard someone with a ping pong paddle saying RAGARAGARAGARAGARAGARAGA
If ^L is invisible in your editor, you’re using a bad editor.
Not saying page feeds are useful, but you can’t complain that you don’t see them.
Her PREDILECTION: REDIRECTION to the PERIHELION.
The acetyl group (-COCH₃) is not acidic itself. The amino acid has both an acidic -COOH group and a basic primary amine (-NH₂) group, but in the compound the primary amine becomes a secondary amine (-NH-), who basicity will depend on surrounding atoms. (If you look at a structural diagram of the compound, the only hydrogen atom it can realistically lose to have acidity is on the -COOH.)
Just to be pedantic, the acidity doesn’t come from the acetyl group - - it comes from the tyrosine, an amino acid.
deleted by creator
By that measure, Lego is probably also the biggest producer of windshields, wigs, doors, windows, etc.
The use of the word “more” in “more money more problems” indicates that both money and problems are continuous variables. Thus, the statement should be modeled with predicate logic, but with analysis. As phrased, the sentence implies a positive derivative between the two variables. If assumed to be valid over the complete range of possible values, “less money, less problems” indeed follows.
But please take a snapshot of the planet first
Wikisource has many: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Category:Cookbooks
It’s the year of the desktop inside Linux
Install the package kdegraphics-thumbnailers, and then depending on the file manager you may have to enable previews, e.g. in Dolphin > Configure Dolphin > Interface > Previews.
Long time ago I wrote down a lot of movies to watch. I was able to watch many, but that one is the oldest in my list that I couldn’t find. Oh, and thanks for the pointer!
Les Diaboliques (1955)
Couldn’t find it anywhere, so it’s still at the top of the list.
This is a pet peeve of mine, but no. All three words forlorn (English), verloren (Dutch), and verloren (German) have the same origin, but none derive from another.
Btw, all three set options given above are included in POSIX since 2024: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/