Thailand on NHSO: Whatever, just take this paracetamol and shut up. NEXT.
Thailand on Social Security: $25 per month per person forever. Oh, it doesn’t cover mental health or Risperidone or whatever. NEXT.
Thailand on Govt Officer (NOT Govt Employee) Healthcare: How may I be of assistance today milord?
But then how do I assert my dominance at meetings? By having hentai on when plugging in the projector?
Fortinet at my corp just banned the whole thing.
In Thailand:
Now I’m intrigued about multiple installs on multiple virtual machines.
Unfortunately I’m not in the business of working for them. They are mostly govt sites in my country and we simply have to work with them sometimes. Their web devs are underpaid general workers who know a bit of Joomla but added this and that shit to the point that it works only on Chrome.
No. He just tweeted a whole damn lot to the point that eventually anything and everything will come true anyway.
(He did not make “explicit” predictions. Just random shit that happened to come true.)
As a Thai I am very intrigued about how the AI-trained version of @sugree will be like.
For context, Sugree has made numerous Nostradamus-like “prophecy” tweets that predated important events in modern Thai history, such as political movements, before disappearing after a lawsuit.
What kind of weird or shitty NIC you’re using that needs a specific driver for Windows?
NO FREE SLOTS IN SUIT INVENTORY
That would be a big plus though.
Old person? Some seem to have a grudge against backpacks.
And that is your opinion.
Again, you are missing the point. It’s that the point of a protected space for women is to promote women’s participation in chess, not to overly tout their position over others.
And no, this does not have to do with the intelligence curve. It’s entirely about careers and participation.
Come to think about it, maybe it’s probably similar to how weight classes work in martial arts, except that the point of this is to guarantee that women can progress somewhat within their careers.
Of course I do not agree that we need to elevate or celebrate them to the level of grandmasters.
In a specific case of transgenders, I understand that transgender women are excluded until an official statement of medical or psychological evaluation has been made, to prevent cases where men illicitly transition just to play in these, and pardon my sexism, weaker leagues.
You know what, I also hate these women’s only scholarships and accelerated education programs too, but I was just speaking the way of the world, not my opinions.
Based on my position in STEM education as a lecturer I am not allowed to have opinions. (Not until I receive full prof.)
That isn’t the problem. The problem is how it has been naturally male-dominant makes it naturally unfriendly to other groups in the first place.
Not everyone is comfortable with this. By a large margin. The dedication of an event for women only creates that comfort zone.
This situation, and I humbly state I mean no fallacy, is strikingly similar to STEM education. Nobody is preventing them from joining, nobody cares if anyone likes it or not, but the fact that it is dominated by a specific group in the “open” field makes it less appealing to the other groups.
We are not discussing the physical advantages. We are discussing about career advantages.
Traditionally chess has been a men’s game, and female adoption is limited. The creation of an exclusive women’s division is to generate a pathway to success for women, even if it’s known to have a lower ceiling compared to men. Basically, it is to foster the game in females.
Spit to the left and right. If it spits back then there is someone else and I’m on the main track.