Kagi’s pretty good and has a Fediverse search feature, but it’s paid. I don’t mind paying, but there’s also no way to do private searches that way, so I’m not going to use it as my main search engine. It’s been good at hunting down memes on Lemmy that I want to find again though.
The trick is that they haven’t read it either, tankies just copy/paste stuff with titles that sound nice
I mostly care about how much caffeine I get, which I understand to be the same regardless of how much ice there is. Generally, small or medium is 2 shots of espresso, and a large is 3 shots.
That is a fun fact! Looks like sheath in English is a cognate with the same etymology
Which thread is that?
Correct!
“farleft” is a fine crossword answer. Equating “far left” with “extremely liberal” is pretty silly IMO though. A much better hint would’ve been “Political faction advocating for radical social change” or something like that
The clue is “Involuntarily made noise while laughing, perhaps”, so sure
The MBFC bot would be useful here. Here’s what they say about the group behind this site:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/environmental-working-group-ewg/
Overall, we rate the Environmental Working Group Left Biased as a strong Pseudoscience website based on the promotion of ideas and claims that oppose scientific consensus
Some discussion over here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42624062
Notably, someone links to this critique:
The study, published in JAMA Pediatrics, is a meta-analysis, a type of study that combines data from many different studies—in this case, mostly low-quality studies—to come up with new results. None of the data included in the analysis is from the US, and the fluoride levels examined are at least double the level recommended for municipal water in the US. In some places in the world, fluoride is naturally present in water, such as parts of China, and can reach concentrations several-fold higher than fluoridated water in the US.
The authors of the analysis are researchers at the National Toxicology Program at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. For context, this is the same federal research program that published a dubious analysis in 2016 suggesting that cell phones cause cancer in rats. The study underwent a suspicious peer-review process and contained questionable methods and statistics.
One can hope 🤞
Good timing, I was just wondering about the API and posted a question over there 👍
Good call, edited to add a warning
Somebody isn’t sanitizing their inputs properly. Like putting a bandaid on a heart attack
Is this a thread for recommending communities that aren’t politics, news, memes, or tech? If so, here’s some comic-related communities:
And a few other miscellaneous communities:
Yeah, I’m kind of divided on this, but figured I’d err on the side of caution, especially if people are complaining. There’s lots of small hills I’m willing to die on, but not this one.
The tits here are NSFW because they’re not an oil painting IMO, there’s lots of similar stuff posted to Lemmy without a NSFW flag because it’s art so it gets a pass, like these:
https://lemmy.world/post/16175194
Regardless, I appreciate you updating it, even if it seems a little silly.
Pretty sure any decent model could easily solve that anyways. To borrow a quote about bears from the National Park Service, there’s now significant overlap between your dumbest users and the smartest AI.
Some background on this comic:
I wish that were true. I know too many people IRL that believe that and are old enough that they should know better.