You’re not getting past this bouncer
ChatGPT came up with the punny name on its own:
A large, heavy animal, resembling a buffalo, dressed as a bouncer at a cyberpunk-themed nightclub in an all-animal world. The club, named ‘Byte the Dust’, showcases a grungy, cyberpunk aesthetic, with a neon sign that’s bold and futuristic. The buffalo bouncer is wearing high-tech, neon-lit glasses and a distinctive cyberpunk mohawk. The outfit is a rugged, cybernetic ensemble with metallic accents. It stands imposingly at the club entrance, which features rough textures, rusted metal, and dimly lit neon lights. The buffalo’s expression is tough and unwavering, in harmony with the gritty cyberpunk theme. The artwork should be in a realistic style, highlighting the formidable presence of the buffalo and the intense, neon-tinged atmosphere of ‘Byte the Dust’.
That looks like a pileup waiting to happen if one of the bikes in front crashed
Sure, but do you think if the lower court decided that the case could move forward, the justices would’ve sat out? I doubt it.
Because there were not enough justices for a quorum—the court needs at least six and only Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson remained—the court affirmed the judgment of a lower court to dismiss the lawsuit.
Clever. Appearing to do the right thing at face value coincides nicely with getting the case against you dropped. It’s likely impossible to sue a majority of the Supreme Court if they don’t care to be sued.
That’s ok, they’ll just move to their second cabin, complete with what looks like an outdoor dining set.
I’m no astrophysicist, but those moon orbits do not look stable. High tide vs low tide must be pretty interesting
Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.
Yeah exactly, though then you’d generally get arguments pushing you towards “But it’s actually totes Jesus”.
The argument I’ve heard is “It must stop somewhere, and whatever it stops at, we’ll call that god”. It’s not a good argument, because it then hopes that you conflate the Judeo-Christian deity with that label and make a whole bunch of assumptions.
It’s often paired with woo that falls down to simply asking “Why?”, such as “Nothing could possibly be simpler than my deity”
Batman’s got muscles on his muscles. Though that’s actually in line with some of the not-so-talented human comic book artists
Soon to be featured on [email protected]
Not AI art, but heavily related:
The size of the tail and head on the first one make it look like it’s just a regular alligator wearing a tiny costume like this:
Good, that’s the only way people like that will change
Which communities are so high volume? I sort by new and don’t have any issues reading every single post from my subscriptions
Not everything is. HTTP and unencrypted SNI are still around.
VPNs are great for avoiding the nastygrams that your ISP forwards to you from media companies. They get sent to some company that doesn’t care about US laws instead, and probably laughed at before being deleted
If a VPN is big enough, you can’t really do that sort of correlation due to the level of traffic involved. I guess that would work for visitors to https://www.woman-inflates-a-balloon-and-sits-on-it-and-pops-it.com/, but wouldn’t work at all for google.com
Using it in pipes looks cool. IMO the usage in writing git commit messages is actually not useful. Almost always you should be writing the why, not the what. Same thing for comments. Unless the code has a good reason to be written inscrutably e.g. for performance, write simple code and comment why you’re doing something as necessary. Which is not to say “the code comments itself”, but the “what” comments should be higher level at a function or file level