35-year old Heidegger slid into the DMs of 18-year old Ahrendt as her professor. This was way before you were cancelled for ‘sleeping with students’ or for ‘being a fascist’ was a thing.

So this school was built on an ancient Pleistocene burial ground. I know that trope well enough to know what happened next

Twister his arms wide open

cat -A bum_sentence.txt

To be very German, here is my favourite Max Planck quote: Scientific Progress marches on one funeral at a time.

Perhaps it was meant like that. And the old guard that disliked his papers is now dead and progress has been made.

So what. I’m also fascinated when I see Humans without a gag reflex.

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

So “Yay me!” for throwing it to it’s certain death?

How do I know this not the real base64enc of Mr. Bean eating pizzaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Right in theory. But I used to live on the fifth floor and carried spiders to the window like I used to do before. In that Appartement the only difference to before was that I yeeted the spider from a height of 15m and not just 1m. That must be like skydiving without a parachute for the spider.

Why? Did the Eastern Hummingbird fuck a couch?

Three hundred year-old Transylvanian vampires really have no business being in Australia. The sun there is even dangerous for us regular humans. For them it’s likely even worse.

You need to get your head checked (by a jumbo jet)

You’re my wonderwall

At least you only have to sink one Bayesian Superyacht to update your priors. To get at population parameters you would need to sink many Frequentist Superyachts

Feddits appear to be a stable currency at first until the chief administrator disappears in the neutral zone and is rumoured to be a prisoner on Romulus. Then the federation needs to restart feddits as feddit.org.

There are tons of statistical methods to get reasonable conclusions without an RCT. Some things can not be detected with an RCT, because the experiment is just impossible to run, so sometimes you need methods to do causal identification with observable data. Here you do not even need causal identification methods for observational data. You just need to do some descriptive statistics for a large group of people well to find interesting patterns. Whether this aging pattern in the mid-40s is causal it coincidental is not important at first. The pattern itself is interesting.

If you make it from coal it is vegan because coal is just plants. If it’s made from petroleum it is not vegan because it is made from dinosaurs.

Damn nature, you scary!