I’m no expert on inspecting bridges, but I’d think that you still would need a professional inspector to do the inspecting, only that they would save the time of actually travelling out to the bridge themselves and instead could do it in their office, no?
And then there are probably things which still need to be done on site, such as non-visual inspections (ultrasound, X-Ray, Vibration testing, Tourque measuring on bolts, paint thickness,…? IDK)
Automatically clear cookies on browser exit, only whitelist the couple of websites you use regularly.
Has the added benefit of making tracking cookies fairly (but not completely) useless
This headline had me guessing wether it’s about the US or some middle east state
Right, grab a GPS mouse, a 12v charger, a few Red Bulls, load up NetStumbler and let’s go :)
Throwback indeed
For some great irony check out this wan show segment where linus talks about how he doesn’t like that a prototype (backpack) of theirs ended up in the hands of the public https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwgZaSYuBLc&t=3209 Time 53:29, in case the timestamped link doesn’t work
Yes, but it is very quick and cheap to get a domain validated cert from a CA that is generally trusted by most web browsers, so once the bad actor has the domain, the should be able to trick most users, only maybe certificate pinning might help, but that is not widely used.
I have no clue if it has tablet support, but I like Liftoff much better than Jerboa
Green Hat Enterprise Linux
To be honest, I’m not sure either, I’m new to this as well.
Under search you can enter their mastodon handle, which will then pull up the mastodon profile. From there you can follow, but I can’t figure out where the posts show up either. I thought it wouls be in the “people” menu, but that seems to only pull up a selection of peoples profiles.
From.what I read in other comments, it should be possible though.
Another option is to use kbin.social, which lets you access both, lemmy as well as mastodon from one single account and user interface
I’d happily pay for the content on youtube, if the user experience was not as miserable as it is.
Search is basically non functional, sort by oldest is gone, search in channel is only available on desktop not on mobile, filter videos by date range is not possible, video quality is mediocre, everyone and their dog makes titles that leave no clue at all about whats actually in the video because “they do better for the algorithm”, if you want to actually read the comments or video thescription on mobile you’ll have to click “show more” and “expand” until your finger hurts, video caches only a few seconds ahead, which makes watching on flaky connections miserable, video quality defaults to 480p even on gigabit internet, subtitles have become almost completely useless, etc., etc., etc.
If they would actually care about the user experience, I’d pay. Instead they just make the ads as annoying as humanly possible, in the hopes that users pay just to get rid of the annoyance, instead of paying for an actually good service.
While I don’t know the numbers, I’d guess that traditional financial systems all together probably are processing orders if magnitudes more transactions. So while a pure total energy consumption comparison is one thing it would be interesting to conpare energy consumption on a few different factors:
Not saying traditional finance would come out on top, I’m legitimately curious