piefood

They’ve had enough seats to fix these problems plenty of times, but chose not to. They’ve had majorities twice that I can remember, and spent the entire time building out the systems that the current administration is using.

So once again I ask: How is it helping to have more seats?

Well, sure, but the Democrats running a terrible candidate, with terrible policies, who tells the voters to sit down and shut up also makes it more likely that the Republican candidate will win.

Both:

• bomb kids
• fight against the working class
• fight against healthcare for all
• give tax money to their rich friends
• fight against human rights
• support genocide
• support large corporations
• support destroying the planet
• support suveillance systems
• support war
• fight aganst making the rich pay their fair share of taxes
• support rapists for president
• support authoritarianism
• openly fight against what their voters want
• support mass deportations without due process
• support the killing of american citizens
• support torture programs

two completely different parties

lol, sure thing buddy

Oh look, a Simp!

How is it helping to have more seats?

They can both be too old.

“I don’t like what is happening in Gaza so I would rather see Trump elected to the White House than Kamala Harris”

I think that’s weird logic as well, which is why I never said that.

If you don’t remember anyone saying that, it’s because you weren’t paying attention.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/23/briefing/kamala-harris-convention-speech.html

Hell, search posts here for “leftists don’t vote”, and you’ll find a lot of simps explaining that it’s “akshually smart of her” to keep moving to the right.

Ok but did you ever wonder how trump was going support Israel because I’m pretty sure he was a billion times more supportive of the genocide than she was.

No, of course I didn’t. I knew he was going to do exactly what he has done. What does that have to do with her support of Israel?

So if there are 2 candidates and one is worse on the genocide issue why do you feel the need to target the lesser evil instead of the greater evil? It makes no sense.

I do target the greater one all the time. That doesn’t mean that the lesser evil isn’t evil.

Anyone who really cared about the genocide would know there was a better chance that she would end it before trump would. If you wanted it to stop she would have been the better choice.

Citation needed. She literally gave up the presidency to keep supporting Genocide. Why would she do anything different after becoming president?

rump just gave Israel everything they asked for so is that better?

No, and I never said it would be better. It’s always amazing to me that libs will defend rape, geocide, the murder of kids, torture, mass deportation, all because “the other side does it worse”. I don’t know how you can be so lacking in morals or ethics to not care about these things.

No, your a partisan hack. You ignore data that makes your team look bad, and spin data to make them look good.

The only people claming the moral high ground are the Democrats that got us into this mess. The same party that helped build out the system that is snatching people off the streets.

You are correct, that is exactly why we got Trump. I’ve been saying that for years.

If the Democrats would put in any effort to fix things, Trump would never had held power again.

Who is talking about the banks? WTF are you on about?

The vast majority, everyone minus a rounding error, endorsed Mamdani and were excited by his victory in the DNC.

I think you missed this part again:

“They begrudgingly supported him once it became clear that he was going to win. They never wanted to support him, they are only doing it to save face.”

It’s almost like you don’t like engaging with data that doesn’t fit your narrative. Weird, I wonder where I heard that before.

…you could have protested and lobbied her to pay more attention to this issue…

People did that, and she blew them off.

…so why choose that?

Because she was very clear that she wanted to continue supporting Israel. She openly gave up voters to keep supporting a genocide. Remember the “I’m speaking” bit she did when people were trying to get her to stop supporting genocide?

Polling showed that was the biggest reason that she lost.

Obama was one of our most popular presidents. Yes, race played a part of it, but she lost because she was a terrible candidate, who ran a terrible campaign, on the coat-tails of a terrible president.

I haven’t seen much evidence that her race had all that much to do with it.

To this day I don’t understand how people let the libs get away with blaming the voters, rather than blaming the people with the money, the power, and the platform.

Voters: “Please stop supporting genocide” Democratic leadership: “No”

Voters: “Please stop deporting people without due process” Democratic leadership: “No”

Voters: “Please stop bombing children” Democratic leadership: “No”

Voters: “Please stop gaslighting us about the state of the economy” Democratic leadership: “No”

Voters: “Please say you’ll do something to stop healthcare from being the biggest cause of bankruptcy” Democratic leadership: “No”

Voters: “Please make the economy work for the people, rather than the rich” Democratic leadership: “No”

Democratic leadership: “It’s the voters fault when the Republicans win. There was nothing we could do!”

Who is dying on a hill? I’m just pointing out that I know you don’t care about data when you find it inconvenient. Data like:

“They begrudgingly supported him once it became clear that he was going to win. They never wanted to support him, they are only doing it to save face.”

Remember when Harris was running, and centrists kept saying that leftists don’t vote? Remember when they said that she should keep moving to the right, to pull in republican voters?

For some crazy reason, I’ve been thinking about those comments a lot lately