• 0 Posts
  • 158 Comments
Joined 6 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2025年5月25日

help-circle




  • Thanks for proving my point ;)

    Also, not harassing you, I left you alone and you kept coming back and starting new attacks. I figured you would be the one to retort with an ad hominem attack and prove my point.

    I hoped you would address the content, but figured it was too much to ask.

    I fully admit to downvoting some of your comments after you misassumed what another user said. They’ve even removed the comments to avoid the confusion you made. I didn’t blanket downvoted all your comments, what rule did I break? I went through a public log, and made downvotes, isn’t that the point of the system?

    Brigading is doing them all, which I didn’t do.


  • Just saying that does nothing. How does a public log solve anything? If anything it gives fuel to the wrong people.

    Have a mod that removed a bunch of comments out of spite? Well a user points that out without context and derails the conversation with an Ad Hominium attack. Too many people just throw out public mod logs without actually engaging the person. They’re the ones that are being trolling and fallicous at that point.

    A public logo doesn’t provide context, ESPECIALLY when mods have no oversite like on Lemmy. They don’t even need to give a reason for removal!

    kinda like if I would point out people shouldn’t engage with you since you’re an aggressive troll.

    How is this good for anything?





  • lol, seriously? Do you check your comments religiously to see how they are being voted on? This has to be the saddest thing I’ve seen online in long while.

    Mind you, from your comments we can see that you’re just an incredibly aggressive person and frequently get downvoted. So of course you would want to know who it is and harass them.

    You’re exactly the reason public logs are an issue. You think every thing is a slight against you. Don’t say stupid shit, don’t get downvoted, what a shocker.




  • Did you miss the detail about the VENDOR increasing price? Their build cost went up, not the price. This would happened irregardless of tariffs, and is expected.

    I guess if you ignore details they specify, you could take that from their comment.

    But again, person is just bitching for the sake of bitching, the provided details show they either don’t understand how the system work, or just bitching.

    They want to applauded for doing what they agreed to, it’s bloody laughable. As a small business owner myself it’s attitudes like this that make the rest look bad.


  • So they want the government to fix a regular issue with quoted work…? The price is expected to change, that’s why you quote to begin with…. It’s likely they don’t even know how their system works.

    That’s even worse lmfao.

    It’s quoted work, it’s volatile already, and the customers game it if they know the material goods in going down. Don’t like it? Don’t quote work. It’s not even a relevant detail to their gripe, just bitching for the sake of bitching at this point.

    The price would be different with or without tariffs, but complain without realizing how the system works I guess.





  • Someone apparently doesn’t know what inside means….

    within the boundaries or confines.

    So if an arm is sticking out, it’s no longer by definition inside. It would be in it, but not inside of.

    You aren’t a very good pedant, not even an okay one.

    ALL SDs have a portion of their body sticking out so you can press it to release, or pull out. You’re incorrectly referring to these as completely inside. Which they aren’t, you missed e mark, and are doubling down on something you attributed the wrong definition too.

    No sd card goes completely inside, if it did, you would need a mechanical release to eject it. And at that point there would likely be a dust cover to protect the moving parts from dust.

    Something won’t ever go inside of something else without some sort of cover to protect said space. This applies to everything, so it’s hilarious a self described “pedant” missed this detail.