It’s so hard for me to grasp that all these people would make these insane claims solely due to their affection for Donald Trump of all fucking people. How on earth did he manage to pied-piper these dipshits so effectively.
It’s so hard for me to grasp that all these people would make these insane claims solely due to their affection for Donald Trump of all fucking people. How on earth did he manage to pied-piper these dipshits so effectively.
I love how you go from ‘guns are just tools’ to ‘I think about fighting all the time’ in like three sentences. I’ve had guns, I used to be a member of the NRA, I’m also not a dipshit who thinks a gun is just as much a tool as a hammer is. They’re designed to kill things, it’s not weak to admit that’s what they’re for.
A gun is a tool with only one use.
it seems a little wild to accuse the Christian Right of not supporting Jews (Israel).
They “support” them in a way, but not out of any real egalitarian or humanitarian reason. For some, supporting Israel is the same as attacking Islam. For others, they support Israel because they think that will hasten Armageddon. It’s not because they really like Jewish people or Judaism, I suspect a number of the Christian Right really just like that Jewish people have a place away from them to call home.
Dukat had more likable moments than Huffman.
Dumb question: what’s a mind map? i’ve heard of it, and seen some examples, but still have no real idea what one is for.
Can’t trust these companies to do what’s right.
This has to be drilled into the collective consciousness as much as possible. There is no such thing as an ethical corporation, or an ethical company that is for-profit – they simply cannot be ethical, they are amoral by design. If Target or Walmart or Netflix do something that is seen as positive, the only reason is a profit motive, not because they are moving towards being ‘good’.
of course the top reply is some nft bullshit
"might only provide ‘milliseconds’
“Don’t give me your mumbo-jumbo Mister Scientist - will the alarm go off or not?!”
A more charitable interpretation is that the text that people thought would best train ChatGPT tended to be thoughtful and well-written posts like yours. Maybe you don’t write like ChatGPT, but ChatGPT writes like you.
As a non-AI Learning Model, I cannot conclude one way or the other with any certainty. What I can say is that ChatGPT responses tend to follow a similar pattern:
Finally, ChatGPT responses tend to end those lists with a summarizing statement that restates the previous ideas - that ChatGPT will often respond in lists, use a formal and logical writing style, and end with a concise summary of the previous statements.
you can probably insure a church in case of civil suit, it probably has a really high premium
I wonder if it’s another missionary