There’s no planet where a viable antitrust case exists. That is pure unbridled delusion.
There’s no planet where a viable antitrust case exists. That is pure unbridled delusion.
Like everything else, the global wealthy will survive with the wealthiest elite thriving. The global poor (mostly in the the global south) will suffer the majority of the consequences. It’ll start with crops withering for lack of water and get worse from there.
There’ll be a great sorting between those two groups as the dividing line becomes starker. It probably won’t be pretty. It definitely won’t be fair. There’s no guarantee the line won’t be drawn within a country and not just between them.
How fast does this happen? If left to just “natural” processes, loss of modern agriculture will take many decades - - just slow enough to boil the frog. But humans have a particular tendency to drive faster than we can see. So in the likely chances whatever actions we take to “mitigate” climate change backfire in our face (fingers crossed on Elon dropping a bunch of rust in the ocean and killing all the krill), I think it’s more likely that many decades is optimistic.
Every single example of means testing has been more expensive than just distributing the benefits to the people that ask for them.
You know people can actually see conservatives actions when it comes to these positions and know you are lying?
Wasn’t that later revealed to be a hoax? It was during one of the major waves of legal advice trolls
So what’s one good conservative position?
Okay but you’re falling into Elon’s trap. You can’t weigh future potential against current harm naively. Particularly when it comes from somebody with a long history of over promising and under delivering. Since we pay the full price up front (loss of science, etc) but will never reap the full benefits promised.