![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/CJ7moKL2SV.png)
The point of blockchains is decentralization, and as Lemmy users we know that decentralized services are difficult to make popular, even if they’re an improvement over their competitors.
The point of blockchains is decentralization, and as Lemmy users we know that decentralized services are difficult to make popular, even if they’re an improvement over their competitors.
There are now Bitcoin Ordinals, which are similar to NFTs but with a sufficient size limit to actually store the media itself.
Cromite is an alternative
How about a fully state-controlled economy?
Not capitalism, since there’s no private capital; not communism, since there’s a state.
Literally everyone relates to this.
If you believe something as common as this is sufficient to diagnose a mental disorder, you might’ve been misdiagnosed (or your diagnosis was explained insufficiently).
~sexism
I do have an idea how “a difficult to kill, unwanted growth” could be put into relation to a war fueled by hatred.
In LibreTube, you can go to
Settings > Instance > Disable Piped proxy
I only ever had issues with the piped proxy, not with the app itself.
How does GrapheneOS “lack boldly”?
None of them have to.
Because they want their voice chats to be monitored?
If you are trying to imply that potatoes and vegan meat aren’t awesome food you are factually wrong.
Where do you get all these Coca Cola flavours? I’m in Germany and have only ever seen vanilla, lemon, cherry and life (next to the default, light and zero).
Your Nana when she was young:
Your comment kinda reads like an ad.
I do think it’s desirable. It’s unnecessary for users to keep track of which tool is best for which purpose if one tool can do it all. There’s no reason why one tool wouldn’t be able to; even in the worst case it could just automatically choose the best tool to answer your prompt, saving you the trouble of doing so.
A single tool isn’t going to meet all those needs yet
I don’t know what your definition of “chasing” is, but whatever it may be it seems to be independent of the group that’s being “chased”.
So in that case you could say “chasing” is bad while a preference is not, completely regardless of whether you’re talking about trans people, disabled people or any other group.
Why would one preference be less valid than another?
Perfectly fine to be into disabled trans people imo.
What makes you assume children (want to) have long term objectives?