This is the integrated search on the home screen of my android (pixel). For a lot of mobile phone users, it’s the fastest way to search something. I can just Google search directly from the home screen instead of opening up a browser.
This is the integrated search on the home screen of my android (pixel). For a lot of mobile phone users, it’s the fastest way to search something. I can just Google search directly from the home screen instead of opening up a browser.
What a sweet lil baby 😻
This is a good list. I watched it in this order and had a good time.
You can do t-shirts for $10 with even smaller runs than that. I’ve done batches of 50 or less at $10 a pop going with a local screenprinter. This is usually 1 or 2 colors.
That’s just left over from the original comic: https://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/1990/06/05
Apparently official skin support no longer exists but Millennium for Steam looks like an unofficial tool that can be used for skins.
To be fair, I made up JLC as an acronym for Jamie Lee Curtis on the spot lol
The MCU is slop, JLC is right.
Exactly! Just like how we say twenty eleven for 2011.
Now the years 2001-2009 we just don’t talk about…
Is banning them from lobbying sufficient?
What if someone retired from politics and then works for Shell and pays for a free weekend getaway to the Bahamas for a Congress member? Or for their “friend”?
Sounds like we need strict laws around what is lobbying
The good news is, a lot of old secrets won’t really matter anymore by the time we have quantum computers that can break the encryption. There will obviously be a big impact on information that was encrypted just before we get a working quantum computer that can crack modern crypto.
In cryptography discussions, I feel like we’re usually implying (or even saying out loud) that the encryption is secure for a sufficient amount of time and computer power. Perhaps people outside of cryptography don’t know it, but I think there is a reasonable expectation that encrypted communications could be decrypted at some point in the future. We just hope it’s sufficiently far enough away (or difficult enough) to not be a problem.
Honestly as soon as we get some good post-quantum crypto, we’ll probably want to switch over to it asap, even if good quantum computers are still far out, just to help alleviate some of this problem. Of course, I imagine we’re still going to be finding new things once the technology is real and being used. Let’s hope the post-quantum cryptography algorithms we come up with actually are strong against a sufficiently large quantum computer.
Sounds like a lot of work. I have no idea how heavy a ship’s anchor is, but I imagine it would be hard to throw any significant distance.
This is it! Old water coolers
Nice, that’s a good point! I didn’t think of that.
Not opposed to this, but why do I want this?
I suppose many responsive sites have a maximum content width that is admittedly a lot smaller than many displays these days. I guess this lets you use a couple more pixels of vertical space by trading the wasted horizontal space.
Now that you say this, it does look a lot like the trucks from this era. Most of the photos I’ve found have flatbeds but you can clearly see the same shape in this photo. I wonder if they sold a panel truck like this or if it was modified to be enclosed.
Really unique looking car. Seems to be a 1950s cab over engine Chevrolet based on reverse image search. A lot of people calling it a Suburban but I think it looks different than photos of Suburbans I’ve found from that era. Maybe it’s been modified, idk.
Prior to version 10, Android releases were given names that were various sweets/desserts. Examples included Ice Cream Sandwich, Nougat, and Oreo.
I think OP is joking that Warm Glazed Donut Ice Cream Sandwich could be an Android version name.
More info: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_version_history
Wow this is unethical. They should all be separate toggles.
Approval voting sounds good.
One issue I see with the star system is that people tend to have preconceptions about star ratings. E.g. some people never rate 5 stars on principle or will rate something 3 stars without realizing that is a 60% rating. My point is I think you might see some weird skew in the results based on this.